[Wild Game]

I NEVER IMPLY anything, I say what I mean. Using the "implied" crap is just that, crap.

Read what I wrote, thats what I meant. No party endorsement at all either.

Like I said, it has become a witch hunt. From you making up things I "implied" to CWO Jackson calling me Micheal Moore.

Thanks for proving my point, you made it easy.

[dinodino]

Wild Game, I've hadenuf of this. I'm going to cut and paste from your post #1. If you don't like the way your words sound, CHANGE THEM, but it was clear to us gun activists what your intent was.

"Has the "Assault Weapons" ban prevented you from enjoying, purchasing, selling or trading firearms? ... How did it not change anything for you?"
[Implication: that the AW ban did NOT change anything for us.]

"My story doesn't reflect a major problem."
[Emphasizing your central point: that the gun ban had no effect and is not a problem.]

"but to allow the demoncraps to get re-elected or elected over a law that doesn't affect our rights (even though the gun grappers thought it would) is really crazy"
[Here, the OUTRAGEOUS assertion that the gun ban did not infringe on our rights, followed by a plea to not elect or reelect Democrats. I presumed from your followup posts that you are not a registered member of the Libertarian or Constitution Parties, so unless your vote was for the Socialist World Workers' Party or whatever they call it, this was a plea to vote Republican.]

In your own words, pal.