[Wild Game]

What are you talking about?

I've made it clear I'm opposed to this ban.

Should John Hinkley be allowed to own a firearm? After all, it doesn't affect me because I didn't try to kill the President.

Our laws need to reflect morals. Self protection, preserving life, general freedom. But should a convicted child rapist be armed to make his next post-parole victim comply easier? I know, "he can get a gun off the streets" BULL$hit! Not everyone (even convicts) know how, or who to get a gun off the street from.

Who shoudn't we, as a "moral" Country NOT allow a firearm.? If anyone at all? Goodness me if I'm not affect by being a rapist or insane Presidental assassin, GOOD!

[philman_36]

Who shoudn't we, as a "moral" Country NOT allow a firearm.?
Which has absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with the premise with which you started this thread.
Your thread has been hijacked and you're just a startled passenger.

[Jhoffa_]

What are you talking about? I've made it clear I'm opposed to this ban.

You made it clear you're talking out of both sides of your face.

Should John Hinkley be allowed to own a firearm? After all, it doesn't affect me because I didn't try to kill the President.

Short of incarceration, how do you propose to stop him? all her has to do is buy one on the black market, rob your house or pick up a newspaper. You haven't given this allot of thought, have you Einstein?

Our laws need to reflect morals.

LOL! Spare the sanctimony..

Our laws need to reflect what's written in the Constitution.

I know, "he can get a gun off the streets" BULL$hit! Not everyone (even convicts) know how, or who to get a gun off the street from.

What, they can't read the news paper or dial the phone?

I bet these innocent babes don't know the first thing about how to get drugs "off the streets" either, do they?

You're a fool.