To: mewzilla
Virus' are very small, if it is carried in the air without rapidly dying then that't big trouble. No typical medical mask is going to protect you from something so small.
9 posted on
04/20/2003 7:12:54 AM PDT by
DB
(©)
To: DB
They know, though, how big corona viruses are. If this mask won't filter out something that size, why were they using it?
36 posted on
04/20/2003 8:51:51 AM PDT by
mewzilla
To: DB
On
another thread, researchers reported the virus can survive on surfaces for over 24 hours
94 posted on
04/20/2003 4:41:45 PM PDT by
SauronOfMordor
(Heavily armed, easily bored, and off my medication)
To: DB
Virus' are very small, if it is carried in the air without rapidly dying then that't big trouble. No typical medical mask is going to protect you from something so small. Can't the companies whose products can detect the airborne presence of Anthrax use them to detect viruses? This could at least warn of SARS-infected persons before they are treated, if deployed in hospitals.
To: DB
It's not a question of excluding airborne, submicron viral particles, given that the virus is almost certain to be contained in droplets.
The ubiquitous and trusty old N-95 protective mask, which excludes particles 0.3 microns and larger is specified for coronavirus protection by the CDC, NIOSH/OSHA, and the WHO.
Unfortunately, they are back-ordered until late May from most suppliers, e.g. 3-M. Alcohol-based wipes and hand lotions are useful for the prevention of hand-eye transmission and are good to have on hand for air travel and other iffy situations..........
130 posted on
04/21/2003 5:09:33 PM PDT by
tracer
(/b>)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson