Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Trailer Trash
"...the development could enable cost and size reductions in rockets as they could use air in the atmosphere as a means of propulsion, rather than having to carry fuel..."
--
Yeah, now that heavy fuel can be replaced by heavy storage batteries.
And, there isn't any 'air' in space to heat up in order to get the propulsive effect.
Just a few of the bugs that need to be worked out, thats all.
5 posted on 04/20/2003 7:45:31 AM PDT by error99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: error99
The atmosphere is used as the reactant-mass while you're in it. The microwave energy is beamed up from the ground - this is the key point, existing craft have to carry all their fuel, which is heavy, hence step-rockets. Beamed energy solutions let you leave the fuel on the ground - not to mention the power plant. As for when you get out of the atmosphere, well you can carry anything to act as reactant mass, say liquid air or water, though I imagine liquid hydrogen would be best because of its low mass.
7 posted on 04/20/2003 7:51:08 AM PDT by alnitak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: error99; Razzz

"Yeah, now that heavy fuel can be replaced by heavy storage batteries."

The microwave generator never leaves the ground. The beam is focused upon the aircraft, and the resulting reaction creates the thrust.

16 posted on 04/20/2003 9:09:15 AM PDT by Trailer Trash
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson