Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

China economy to slow as SARS hits travel, shops
Reuters via Forbes ^ | 21 Apr 2003 | Scott Hillis

Posted on 04/21/2003 1:22:40 AM PDT by flamefront

BEIJING, April 21 (Reuters) - Vacation plans are scrapped, shopping malls are nearly deserted and restaurant staff wait nervously to serve diners who never show up.

China's admission that the SARS virus is far more widespread than previously acknowledged is taking the shine off an economy that has been the envy of the region, analysts said on Monday.

On Sunday, the government said the number of cases of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome cases in Beijing was almost 10 times higher than previously reported. The government sacked Health Minister Zhang Wenkang and Beijing Mayor Meng Xuenong.

Nearly 80 people are known to have died in China and more than 1,800 infections have been reported, accounting for nearly half the world total.

Many economists say it is too early to give specific estimates of the ecomomic toll, but the impact of SARS on daily activity in Beijing is evident.

"Normally the road to the market is so jammed with cars you can't even get through," said Chen Li, a Beijing musician who lives near a major antique and furniture market.

"These past few days it has been empty and even bicycles are few and far between," Chen said.

GROWTH SEEN SLOWING

Sparkling upscale shopping malls with their marble tiles have been turned into virtual echo chambers as customers, fearful of contracting the potentially deadly virus, opt to delay purchases.

Meanwhile, turnips, garlic, bleach and face masks have become hot commodities as people scramble to stock up on items said to guard against SARS.

China also cancelled the week-long May Day national holiday, known as "Golden Week" for its booster effect on tourism and consumer spending, dealing a blow to travel agencies and hotels.

"So far we are still looking at the impact on GDP coming from reduced demand for services," said Yiping Huang, an Asia-Pacific economist with Salomon Smith Barney in Hong Kong.

China seems in little danger of missing its official growth target of seven percent for the full year, but the outbreak all but ensures the second quarter won't match the stunning 9.9 percent growth during the year to the first quarter.

Huang said he had lowered his forecast for the rise in full-year gross domestic product to 7.3 percent from 7.6 percent.

That could come down further if China fails to contain SARS, leading to factory closures or a reduction in foreign investment, which has been a key economic driver, Huang said.

"There are other implications we will assess later on, like the impact on the supply of manufactured goods or whether they will start to close down factories," Huang said. "These are certainly areas we are keeping an eye on."

Economists have also said they would watch for the impact on a giant twice-yearly trade fair currently being held in Guangdong, the booming southern province where SARS is believed to have originated. Officials have not given attendance figures, but anecdotal evidence suggests participation in the fair, especially by foreign businesses, is down dramatically.

NOT LIKE HONG KONG, YET

Analysts said China has a few things in its favour to help it weather the spread of SARS.

Its population of 1.3 billion means the proportion of those with the disease is very low. Tourism makes up only a few percent of the economy. And the country's vast size means SARS will spread more slowly than in regions like Hong Kong.

Last week, the State Statistical Bureau said SARS would hit the economy later this year, but estimated the impact would be modest and largley limited to tourism, retailing and catering.

"This is definitely a negative for local consumption, but I reiterate the point that it's not anything like what we're seeing in Hong Kong and Singapore," said Paul Cairns, an analyst with IDEALglobal in Singapore.

"The risk is that the disease continues to spread, so if we start talking many thousands of people infected, and the widespread panic like we've seen in Hong Kong, then we'll see more of an impact," Cairns said.





TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: china; sars
Consider that if the following statement holds any truth this will devastate the Chinese economy far worse than indicated above.
1 posted on 04/21/2003 1:22:40 AM PDT by flamefront
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: flamefront
this will devastate the Chinese economy

This will affect the economy of the U.S. even if SARS doesn't become a problem here. Think of all those Chinese imports that won't reach our shores if their workers are sick or dead.

2 posted on 04/21/2003 1:59:16 AM PDT by Fitzcarraldo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fitzcarraldo
Which means manufacturing things in the USA again. Things happen for a reason, and this may be very good for our own economy.
3 posted on 04/21/2003 2:41:05 AM PDT by 11B3 (Happiness IS a warm gun. After a long day's use.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 11B3
This may be time to pull out of China and boost up our own manufacturing or at least put it abroad in more friendlier countries like the Phillipines, E. Europe, India, S.America etc.
4 posted on 04/21/2003 2:48:46 AM PDT by Cronos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Cronos
If we do not know how SARS is transmitted, why are we not haulting imports from this country? Unfortunately, I belive that our economy is directly linked to China and we are so dependant on their exports that we will risk spreading this disease here before we break the tie to the slave labor that we take so much advantage of.
5 posted on 04/21/2003 4:51:09 AM PDT by RS_Rider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: RS_Rider
I couldn't agree with you more. Things are too risky. I'm not going to buy any more made in China stuff, wait, I already do that, I'm going to ask around even with the stuff that ain't labelled!
6 posted on 04/21/2003 4:55:33 AM PDT by Cronos (2004's coming up. Are you ready?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: flamefront
A tad like killing your own parents and then wanting for sympathy for being a orphan.
7 posted on 04/21/2003 5:18:08 AM PDT by CathyRyan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CathyRyan
Yeah, but who expects logic from chicoms or fundies?
8 posted on 04/21/2003 5:19:09 AM PDT by Cronos (2004's coming up. Are you ready?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: CathyRyan
A tad like killing your own parents and then wanting sympathy for being a orphan.
9 posted on 04/21/2003 5:19:23 AM PDT by CathyRyan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: flamefront
"Analysts said China has a few things in its favour to help it weather the spread of SARS. Its population of 1.3 billion means the proportion of those with the disease is very low. Tourism makes up only a few percent of the economy. And the country's vast size means SARS will spread more slowly than in regions like Hong Kong."

This is some of the worst "analysis" I have seen outside of the Clinton administration.
Population size per se means only that it would take a few weeks or months for a geometric progression to take its toll.
The number of those infected is much higher that the official numbers -- how much higher? The Chinese Government may know but these analysts are probably clueless. In any event the number of infected and their contacts to date is probably too high to effectively enforce a quarantine.
Tourists aren't the only people that travel.
Size and geographic isolation may result in isolated pools available to reinfect the whole as well as perhaps insulating some populations from the disease.

In addition, the "analysts" overlook the fact that Hong Kong's health care system, sanitation, level of education and overall infrastructure make it much better equiped to handle an epidemic.

Hong Kong is densely populated, but the rest of China has huge urbanized pockets that are dense enough to present all the same challenges as Hong Kong in this respect. I would rate this as locally significant, but not a mitigating factor for China as a whole.

Unless I am missing the point this is a very lame bit of spin.

10 posted on 04/21/2003 5:34:53 AM PDT by R W Reactionairy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thud
FYI
11 posted on 04/21/2003 5:56:55 AM PDT by Dark Wing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: flamefront
Have they found a cure for SARS yet? Can it be prevented via vaccine? Does everyone who gets SARS die from it? If not, what is the mortality rate for those folks who get SARS? Also how is SARS different than the normal flus that go around and what are its symptoms?

This disease is starting to scare me.

12 posted on 04/21/2003 6:42:41 AM PDT by PJ-Comix (A Person With No Sense Of Humor Is Someone Who Confuses The Irreverent With The Irrelevant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix
Check the recent SARS reports on FreeRepublic

There is no vaccine, and none expected for some time. But even a vaccine may likely be ineffective for the mutations of the SARS virus. Immune systems apparently have no response for this completely new virus. Even testing for the virus has apparently only been developed in the last day. This because the decoding of the virus's DNA happened very quickly only last week.

13 posted on 04/21/2003 7:39:57 AM PDT by flamefront (To the victor go the oils.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Fitzcarraldo
Think of all those Chinese imports that won't reach our shores if their workers are sick or dead.

It'll take a much larger epidemic to punch a hole in China's 700-million strong working-age population. Their supply of cheap labor is almost literally endless. On top of that there's already way too much manufacturing established in southern China for foreign companies to readily relocate. Whatever's in China is likely to stay there. It's the new investment that's still on the drawing board that might be reconsidered.

14 posted on 04/21/2003 7:52:43 AM PDT by Filibuster_60
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: R W Reactionairy
I agree that that statement is poor.

What does make sense is that
The biggest contribution to the spread of novel diseases is made by China's 94 million migrant workers who hail from the countryside and seek work in places like Beijing and Guangzhou.

And that the under-reported infections are much greater than anyone is daring to even estimate for fear of inciting panic while so many unknown still surround this disease.

15 posted on 04/21/2003 7:53:15 AM PDT by flamefront (To the victor go the oils.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: flamefront
There is no vaccine, and none expected for some time. But even a vaccine may likely be ineffective for the mutations of the SARS virus.

How many times have we repeated to ourselves that there's no true cure for the common cold, only treatment for its symptoms?

Apparently SARS is a lethal version of the common cold. I've got a feeling that it'll eventually lead to a comprehensive overhaul of every healthcare system in the world.

16 posted on 04/21/2003 7:56:20 AM PDT by Filibuster_60
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: flamefront
And that the under-reported infections are much greater than anyone is daring to even estimate for fear of inciting panic while so many unknown still surround this disease.

The Chinese elites generally have little concern whatsoever for the common citizenry. Since there's so many of them, the rulers act as if they're running an ant colony, where the individual is an expendable commodity. There's little to surprise people in the Chinese government's behavior. The difference today is that they can't hide the truth in such an intertwined world, so they'll have to adapt or die. SARS is definitely the biggest crisis for China since Tiananmen.

17 posted on 04/21/2003 8:03:41 AM PDT by Filibuster_60
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson