Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Offshore outsourcing grows
The Atlanta Business Chronicle ^ | April 18, 2003 print edition | Anya Martin

Posted on 04/21/2003 11:41:20 AM PDT by Willie Green

For education and discussion only. Not for commercial use.

To trim costs last year, Alpharetta-based MAPICS outsourced approximately 80 percent of its major application coding and development to New Delhi, India-based HCL Technologies and formed a five-year partnership.

A year later, the money saved, an estimated 35 percent compared with handling the labor in-house, helped keep the firm profitable in a troubled economy and to facilitate its $30 million acquisition of competitor Frontstep Inc. (Nasdaq: FSTP) in January.

"It's just a good model for us; what it gives me is the flexibility to scale up or down depending on the product development projects over time," said Alan MacLamroc, chief technology executive for MAPICS Inc. (Nasdaq: MAPX), a manufacturing software services provider.

MAPICS is just one of a growing number of U.S. companies outsourcing IT development and software writing overseas to save money, and the trend is expected to grow, according to industry analysts.

The North American IT outsourcing market is projected to increase from $101 billion in 2000 to $160 billion in 2005, and 26 percent of firms already using offshore services plan to double their spending in this area within the next year, according to Gartner Dataquest.

Popular locations for IT outsourcing include India, Ireland, China, Singapore, the Philip-pines, Russia and South Africa.

This trend is similar to companies sending manufacturing overseas to take advantage of cheap labor and operating costs 25 years ago, said Martin Tilson, partner and chair of the technology practice in the Atlanta offices of law firm Kilpatrick Stockton LLP.

An increasing number of noncore services are also being exported to educated offshore work forces, including IT services, product and software development, call centers, human resources, bookkeeping and even entire financial departments, he said.

"We live in an electronic global marketplace where physical borders are less constraining, so once services are moved out and working properly, short of a cataclysmic war where borders are closed, they are probably not coming back," Tilson said.

Within the next 15 years, U.S. companies will send abroad an estimated 3.3 million U.S. service industry jobs, or $136 billion in U.S. wages, according to Forrester Research.

MAPICS' outsourcing to HCL Technologies Ltd. resulted in an approximately 12 percent staff reduction, and the company also underwent a restructuring last spring after the January 2002 deal, MacLamroc said.

Fortune 500 or Fortune 1000 firms have led the trend of offshore outsourcing, with small to midsized companies accounting for just 1 percent of all outsourcing.

That number is not expected to increase to more than 10 percent by 2005, according to Forrester.

Countries compete

The number of countries offering cheap IT labor is also in flux, with new players entering the market while more established ones mature, said Stan Anderson, managing partner at TechDiscovery LLC, an Atlanta-based software development outsourcing provider, which is considering bidding jointly with Indian firms for jobs.

"There's quite a bit of competition among developing shops in cities like Hyderabad and Banglor," he said. "They're now hiring from each other in much the way it was in Silicon Valley a few years ago."

However, if Indian IT salaries are driven up too significantly, cost advantages may diminish, with U.S. companies looking to other locales for talent, Anderson said.

For example, Israeli software firms, once a low-cost alternative, are now more likely to team with U.S. companies as equal players, said Tom Glazer, president of the American-Israeli Chamber of Commerce, Southeast region.

Not all overseas outsourcing experiences offer a happy ending, and companies should ensure that projects sent offshore are clearly defined in terms of goals and technical requirements, Anderson said.

"If you can't explain it to people thousands of miles away, you're not going to have a satisfactory outcome," he said.

MAPICS evaluated potential outsourcers rigorously, checking company references with other firms who had used them and carefully evaluating each contractor's network infrastructure, MacLamroc said.

Communication

A key factor to success is ongoing management and training, as well as ongoing daily communication with the vendor, made easy by videoconferencing advances, he said.

"We have online meetings where we may be projecting the actual application screens live and walking through a design review or an actual code review," MacLamroc said.

Although security might seem like it would be a bigger concern when sending work overseas in the current climate of terrorism, MacLamroc said he felt no more worries in this area than if a project was done domestically.

"Back when there was a lot of saber-rattling between Pakistan and India, we did fairly extensive what-if planning with the vendor in case things were to spiral out of hand," he said. "But I don't think there's any significant difference with security. There are just heightened security [risks] everywhere around the world right now."

Anya Martin is a contributing writer for Atlanta Business Chronicle. Reach her at atlantatechbiz@bizjournals.com.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government
KEYWORDS: freetrade; globalism; leftwingactivists; outsourcing; thebusheconomy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 381-391 next last
Related threads:

State jobs move offshore as firms continue to economize

Small manufacturers blame woes on foreign competition

Export Illusions: Most International Trade Agreements are about Investment, Not Exports

1 posted on 04/21/2003 11:41:20 AM PDT by Willie Green
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Willie Green
This is going to cost Bush and possibly the Pubbies the next election.

People are not spending in a way to spur the economy. IT and EE fields are experiencing an unemployment rate higher then the national average. IT people have been out of work for months at a time, and some even over a year.

The companies may indeed be saving themselves money by outsourcing overseas, but they are directly harming the economy.

The pubbies need to understand that the economy won't get better if new jobs are offshore and not here. It takes people spending money to get companies to hire and produce more goods. The companies are waiting for this spending to happen before taking financial risks. But shipping jobs offshore is helping to keep peoples spending at bay.

Basically, we are seeing "Trickle Down Economics" work -- but the trickle down happens to be overseas.
2 posted on 04/21/2003 11:56:22 AM PDT by 1stFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1stFreedom
I know that for myself, being a die hard conservative, I will not vote for Bush or pubbies in the next round of elections if they do not stop this outsourcing problem.

3 posted on 04/21/2003 11:57:31 AM PDT by 1stFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green
Within the next 15 years, U.S. companies will send abroad an estimated 3.3 million U.S. service industry jobs, or $136 billion in U.S. wages, according to Forrester Research.

This is why it's pointless to pursue a career in I.T. It isn't that these companys can't find Americans with the talent to do the work, it's that Americans aren't willing to go through the time and expense, not to mention the stress of keeping up with the latest technology, only to be told they're overpaid and their job is being outsourced. After 15 years I'm done with this field.

Look for this trend to spread to the financial industry.

4 posted on 04/21/2003 11:59:04 AM PDT by YankeeReb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1stFreedom
Since when has outsourcing been only republican promoted?
5 posted on 04/21/2003 12:00:45 PM PDT by Magnum44 (Duty, Honor, Country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 1stFreedom
Stopping the "outsourcing problem" goes completely against the tenents of a free market.
6 posted on 04/21/2003 12:00:59 PM PDT by sharktrager
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 1stFreedom
I have to believe that the unemployment statistics don't paint the real picture. I know plenty of people who have been outsourced, find themselves taking a job often at slightly better than minimum wage, and yet these people aren't counted as unemployed. I'd love to see a comparison of real wages in I.T. over the last 5 years.
7 posted on 04/21/2003 12:03:16 PM PDT by YankeeReb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green
Having lived through many changes, I predict that outsourcing will not be as successful as hoped. The interests of the offshore companies are not necessarily aligned with those of the US companies, meaning that they will have to have many people in this country watching and supervising their outsourcers. Either that, or they will be totally screwed and ripped off.

Eventually, many companies will decide that it would actually be cheaper to do the work themselves in this country. This does not even take into account the changes in currency valuations that will inevitably come as the standards of living rise in places like India, making their workers that much more expensive. I really think that the big advantage they have now is not cost, but that they have so many well-educated young people who are willing to work hard.
8 posted on 04/21/2003 12:03:58 PM PDT by proxy_user
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: YankeeReb
Look for this trend to spread to the financial industry.

It's already in the medical industry. X-rays are transmitted to India to be examined by radiologists there.

9 posted on 04/21/2003 12:06:11 PM PDT by SauronOfMordor (Heavily armed, easily bored, and off my medication)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green
I work for MCI and we service data circuits for GE. Their Network Ops center is in Bombay India. I can tell you that while GE saves money from this arrangement, it is difficult to deal with the techs from India. First, there is the language barrier. The techs are also hard to deal with because they do not understand the workings of the US telecomm networks and use a very cut & dried script when dealing with issues. They are inflexible when pursuing issues thus making it hard to work with them effectively.
10 posted on 04/21/2003 12:07:05 PM PDT by StoneColdTaxHater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sharktrager
Stopping the "outsourcing problem" goes completely against the tenents of a free market.

So does fast-tracking and expanding H1 and L1 visas.

11 posted on 04/21/2003 12:08:14 PM PDT by RockyMtnMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green
Maybe they should just pass out the paper hats and fast food smocks at U.S. high school graduations and be done with it.
12 posted on 04/21/2003 12:08:28 PM PDT by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: StoneColdTaxHater
...it is difficult to deal with the techs from India.

The general consensus in the software industry is that their work is shoddy and unreliable. The general consensus among management is that at a fraction of the cost, that's more than acceptable.

13 posted on 04/21/2003 12:10:49 PM PDT by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: 1stFreedom
if they do not stop this outsourcing problem.

And just how would you go about that, without more gooberment regulation of free enterprise?
14 posted on 04/21/2003 12:12:52 PM PDT by newcats
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie
That depends if your building software that is mission critical. Do you want that heart rate monitor programmed by a guy in Bangalor making 5k a year or a guy in Boston that makes 120k a year.
15 posted on 04/21/2003 12:13:22 PM PDT by RockyMtnMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: RockyMtnMan
If I'm getting the monitor for myself, I go with the 120K programmer. If I'm a management wonk trying to make budget and pump up the bottom line, then the choice is even easier (since its not MY life on the line).
16 posted on 04/21/2003 12:15:44 PM PDT by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: *"Free" Trade
http://www.freerepublic.com/perl/bump-list
17 posted on 04/21/2003 12:16:16 PM PDT by Libertarianize the GOP (Ideas have consequences)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie
Except when the lawyers come after your company and take you for every penny, then it's not so cheap anymore is it?
18 posted on 04/21/2003 12:17:38 PM PDT by RockyMtnMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: All
The key to this article is:

"Fortune 500 or Fortune 1000 firms have led the trend of offshore outsourcing, with small to midsized companies accounting for just 1 percent of all outsourcing."

Of course small to midsize companies are what keeps the economy going, not giant impersonal behomoths who are always looking for ways to cut another 1000 jobs. Personally, I have little to fear in the way of outsourcing as I am one of only three people that represent the small company that I work fors (200 or so employees) entire IT staff. For small to midsize companies outsourcing is inconceivable.

19 posted on 04/21/2003 12:18:11 PM PDT by Smogger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green
A good friend is pres. of a company in So Calif that designs computer perpherial cards, such as VME devices for those of you who know your industrial control systems. About 5 years ago he found it was getting more and more difficult to get circuit boards produced. The reason...etching circuit boards is a messy chemical business, and one that the California EPA frowned upon. Many circuit board companies could not comply with the rules they were burdned with and have disappeared.

One day a salesman who used to work for one of the companies that had folded called on him and offered to get the job done with his new employer in Taiwan. And easy too...just e-mail the circiut board design files. The results..excellent boards and cheaper too!

After a while the same company in Taiwan said they could also do the component installation and soldering. It's that damn dangerous lead you know! Cheaper and better quality than he could do it himself in So. California.

Then they offered to do the compoents purchasing too...also cheaper.

So now the company has no assembly operation at all in So. Calif, just design and sales. Half the employees and double the sales.

Those who lost their jobs of course can thank for California EPA for the improved environment in the unemployment lines.

20 posted on 04/21/2003 12:18:45 PM PDT by Voltage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 381-391 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson