I think the title is a bit misleading. It looks to me like the authorities are reiterating a current policy, not making a new one.
To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
I'll bet a few of Saddam's gold plated guns will end up in some General's private collections.
2 posted on
04/21/2003 2:01:45 PM PDT by
Paraclete
To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
What about Saddam's femur?
To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
How many hundreds of millions of dollars did they find in that one house?
I hate to say this, but somewhere down the line, some of those dollars are likely to go missing.
To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
Weapons that emit gas.
Darn! I guess that leaves out Baghdad Bob.
8 posted on
04/21/2003 2:23:51 PM PDT by
Wolfstar
(Now to turn our attention to the reelection of a great President.)
To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
Think again.
Once upon a time, guns warn't skeery to most folks.
Bringing weapons home was commonplace after the First and Second World Wars. Even Class IIIs (full auto).
There's a passage in Unintended Consequences that discusses this.
To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
If taking of the following is one of the illegals, then why are the Clintons in jail?
Property belonging to the United States or an allied nation.
15 posted on
04/21/2003 3:10:09 PM PDT by
UpToHere
To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
REMFO's reign.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson