Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Poor Sean Hannity
King ^ | April 22, 2003 | Charley Reese

Posted on 04/22/2003 4:54:43 AM PDT by Beenliedto

Poor Sean Hannity

Sean Hannity, a radio talk-show host and Fox News whiner, has a one-rut mind. Every criticism or dissent, no matter what the subject, the topic or the source, is a left-wing attack against his hero, George W. Bush.

Well, what can you expect from an immature groupie? Every time he tries to think, his face reflects the pain of the effort. But he really showed his emptiness recently when he said that criticism of the United States failing to guard the Iraqi National Museum was — you guessed it — just left-wing soreheads who are mad that President Bush's war has been so successful.

Give me a break. That museum is one of the five greatest museums on Earth. It contained treasures that are the heritage of mankind. There are 140,000 U.S. military personnel in Iraq. We've protected all the oil fields, north and south. Do you really believe we couldn't have spared two fire teams to guard the irreplaceable artifacts of the beginnings of Western civilization? Of course we could have. Somebody just goofed.

This is not a left/right, liberal/conservative issue. It's not a question of patriots versus traitors, as the morons among the neoconservative crowd try to paint every human being who refuses to click his heels and salute their guru, Richard Perle, and their emperor, George Bush. This is a cultural issue. Three great treasures — the museum, the National Library and the largest collection of Koranic writings in the world — were looted and burned. Since we had destroyed the Iraqi government, it was our responsibility to protect them.

I don't blame President Bush. I'm sure he's unaware of their existence. After all, he brags about not reading. But what would we say if the crowds who have rioted in Washington in the past had been allowed to loot and burn the Smithsonian and the Library of Congress? Do you think we would have accepted an excuse that there weren't enough cops to protect those two treasures?

One hates to disillusion the permanently adolescent among us, but this tiny sliver of life in which we are participating is a dot on a long line of human civilization. One day, we will be as forgotten as the Assyrians, and hopefully some museum will have artifacts from our brief stay on the stage of history.

There is a definitely a whiff of anti-intellectualism — so characteristic of fascist states — in the air. Beware of bully boys who worship the military and scoff at museums and libraries. Beware of people whose limited brains see everyone as either an ally or an enemy. Beware of people who can't tell the difference between patriotism and military conquest. Beware of people so stupid and ignorant that they accept anything and everything the political and the media demagogues tell them.

Thomas Jefferson, who would have been outraged by the loss of the museum and the library, said, "Those who expect to be ignorant and free expect what never was and never will be." Amen cubed.

I'm no longer concerned about liberals or conservatives, leftists or rightists. I just pray to God for a non-ideologue with a three-digit IQ. If we don't elevate the level of intelligence and integrity of our government, we are going to end up floating on the cesspool of history.

As for anyone being disappointed that the war was conducted rapidly and successfully, that's bull. I was opposed to the war, but I'm damned glad it was quick and there were as few casualties as there have been. Every anti-war person I know of or have read feels the same way. You have to be a really sick puppy to imagine that anyone would want to see Americans die just because they disagree with the policy that put them in harm's way. Let me spell it out for the mentally impaired: People are anti-war because they do not wish to see anyone die — our soldiers, their soldiers, our civilians or their civilians. Anti-war is pro-life.

© 2003 by King Features Syndicate, Inc.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: charleyreese; hannity; talkradio
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 361-369 next last
Now just remember that a few short months ago, everyone on Free republic loved this guy.
1 posted on 04/22/2003 4:54:43 AM PDT by Beenliedto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Beenliedto
I disagree with Charlie on the war, but he's spot on regarding Hannity.

I heard the show Reese is referring to in the article. It was a disgrace. Hannity actually said something along the lines of, "big deal, so we broke a bunch of stupid clay pots."

2 posted on 04/22/2003 4:56:40 AM PDT by cicero's_son
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Beenliedto
And they don't now? Because of a museum?
3 posted on 04/22/2003 4:57:21 AM PDT by Puppage (You may disagree with what I have to say, but I will defend to your death my right to say it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cicero's_son
big deal, so we broke a bunch of stupid clay pots."

And, just how many US lives are YOU willing to lose the protect those "pots"?

Sure, I agree that in the interest of history & such, that it would wonderful to have saved them. HOWEVER, it is secondary to the removal of Saddam & his thugs.

Ya thinks it's POSSIBLE, that all this crying about the museum is coming from those on the left because there's NOTHING ELSE THEY CAN COMPLAIN ABOUT, OR TAKE ISSUE WITH?

4 posted on 04/22/2003 5:01:09 AM PDT by Puppage (You may disagree with what I have to say, but I will defend to your death my right to say it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Beenliedto
I grew up reading this guy's columns. He's been senile for quite some time now.
5 posted on 04/22/2003 5:01:11 AM PDT by Amore (I hate tag lines)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Beenliedto
Is Charley a liberal? Sure sounds like one since he parrots every liberal talking point he hears.
6 posted on 04/22/2003 5:01:14 AM PDT by ChuckHam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cicero's_son
Why was it responsibility of the US military to protect and defend the heritage of the Iraqi people? After WWII, the Japanese people never looted their own treasures, neither did the Germans. I would imagine that the US military had enough on their plate securing the future of the Iraqi people. The past should have been protected by the Iraqi people themselves.
7 posted on 04/22/2003 5:02:34 AM PDT by MrsEmmaPeel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: cicero's_son
I heard the show Reese is referring to in the article. It was a disgrace. Hannity actually said something along the lines of, "big deal, so we broke a bunch of stupid clay pots."

Your wrong, and so is Charlie! Sean was referring to the FACT that the real left whiners were more concerned about this museum than Iraqi's being tortured and their lives!

Get a clue.

8 posted on 04/22/2003 5:02:48 AM PDT by sirchtruth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Beenliedto

People are anti-war because they do not wish to see anyone die — our soldiers, their soldiers, our civilians or their civilians. Anti-war is pro-life.

I haven't seen this much bologna since I got out of grade school. Those who were anti-war were saying that it was OK to let a despotic regime continue to murder thousands of people rather than us get involved. Reminds me of that famous case in New York where people did nothing while a woman was raped and killed on the street in front of their homes. Being anti-war means that you consider your life and the life of your friends to be more important than some third-world, non-white person's life.

That said, not everyone who is anti-war is anti-Bush. Just most of them.

9 posted on 04/22/2003 5:02:59 AM PDT by BruceS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Beenliedto
Sean may not be the heir to El Rushbo. He is way more red meat eating than Rush and does not yet have the intellectual gravitas and depth of Rush.
10 posted on 04/22/2003 5:03:22 AM PDT by Helms (U.N./E.U. VS. U.S.A. ...The French and Germans Are Anti-Western)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Beenliedto
Well, what can you expect from an immature groupie? a senile old idiot? Every time he tries to think, his face reflects the pain of the effort.


11 posted on 04/22/2003 5:06:27 AM PDT by Alouette (Why is it called "International Law" if only Israel and the United States are expected to keep it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Puppage
I'm not on the Left, but I think the looting of that museum was a tragedy.

Don't make the same mistake the Left does, boiling everything down to scoring political points or defending our goal. Conservatives care about history and culture, as we should. It's one of the things that distinguishes us from the Left, which always wins when people are cut off from their past. After all, who are the great culture-destroyers of the 20th century? Mao, Lenin, Pol Pot...

12 posted on 04/22/2003 5:06:51 AM PDT by cicero's_son
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Beenliedto
I haven't read this guy in some time. I would like to know why he has such a visceral hatred of George Bush. He has managed to roll into several columns every stupid comment I have heard from the left wing over the last 3 years, such as the LIE that Bush brags about not reading books.

He is also apparently unable to read current wire reports, statements by archaeological and museum experts, and the Wall Street Journal, all of whom have pointed out that there is a very real possibility that this was an inside job done under cover of the looting.

13 posted on 04/22/2003 5:07:02 AM PDT by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Beenliedto
We've protected all the oil fields, north and south. Do you really believe we couldn't have spared two fire teams to guard the irreplaceable artifacts of the beginnings of Western civilization? Of course we could have. Somebody just goofed.

Yes, that would be Saddam Hussein and regime. They were told to get out. They were given 48 hours. They refused. Oil fields: let's see, at the last war, hundreds were set on fire. We were prepared this time, only 9 I believe were set.

Human life is worth more than antiquities. Those who stole from the museums are the guilty party, not the US who freed human beings from prisons, tyranny, and torture.

I don't blame President Bush. I'm sure he's unaware of their existence. After all, he brags about not reading.

This is an untruth...George Bush reads, a lot.

There is a definitely a whiff of anti-intellectualism — so characteristic of fascist states — in the air.

Yes, there is, and it's coming from people like you.

14 posted on 04/22/2003 5:07:10 AM PDT by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Beenliedto
Charlie (misplaced priorities, misplaced anger) Reese, trying to fire up the "arts and croissant" crowd. Whaaa whaa whaa...what a column.
15 posted on 04/22/2003 5:07:22 AM PDT by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sirchtruth
I'm not wrong.

I heard the show.

I listen to him just about every day.

16 posted on 04/22/2003 5:07:45 AM PDT by cicero's_son
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Beenliedto
It's not a question of patriots versus traitors, as the morons among the neoconservative crowd try to paint every human being who refuses to click his heels and salute their guru, Richard Perle, and their emperor, George Bush

Very true.

17 posted on 04/22/2003 5:07:50 AM PDT by oldvike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BruceS
This reminds of the time that Klinton didn't bomb a palace in Yugoslavia where he could have taken out the evil Milosevic because there was a Picasso hanging there. I guess we should have skipped the invasion to preserve the museum.
18 posted on 04/22/2003 5:08:47 AM PDT by appeal2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Beenliedto
Sean is getting on my nerves... Especially during the Lott issue. Hannity would stick up for Lott if Lott called the Black Caucus an "auction". Colmes is wrong 90% of the time but I like his style more than Hannity who just likes to scream and name call. At least Colmes debates without the emotion a liberal tends to debate with. Funny its Sean who gets all worked up and emotional.

Colmes is butt ugly but even tempered, Sean is a good looking guy (being comfortable in my sexuality) but an emotional hot head.
19 posted on 04/22/2003 5:09:05 AM PDT by smith288 (Visit my gallery http://www.ejsmithweb.com/fr/hollywood/hollywood.php)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Beenliedto
Come on, it has been reported that the theft of the museum was an inside job. The thieves had the keys to the vaults.

It has also been reported that a large portion of the artifacts were in fact copies. It has been reported that the museum had a plan that could safeguard pieces in the museum within 24 hours.

As to the dig on Sean, I think he was right. The life of one of our military on the ground is worth anything in that museum.

20 posted on 04/22/2003 5:09:05 AM PDT by mware
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 361-369 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson