Skip to comments.
NOW defends Scott Peterson's right to choose
Jewish World Review ^
| 4/22/02
| Scott Ott
Posted on 04/22/2003 12:55:36 PM PDT by Caleb1411
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-52 next last
To: HairOfTheDog
Got it. See post 15.
21
posted on
04/22/2003 1:37:13 PM PDT
by
agrace
To: Caleb1411
"If he had killed his wife then removed a tape worm from her and it died, he would only be charged with one murder," said the NOW spokesman. "That is a precisely accurate analogy using irrefutable logic."
A precise analogy this is NOT. A child is something that two people conceive together to procreate. A tape worm is a parasitic animal that uses your body without your knowledge. There is a huge difference that we do not seem to have trouble seeing. Not to mention the fact that there are no laws regarding the killing of tape worms extracted from a human body, before or after that bodies murder. These creatures of NOW need to shut the @$*# up!
22
posted on
04/22/2003 1:47:59 PM PDT
by
fishntex
To: agrace
It's satire... relax!
To: Caleb1411
"If he had killed his wife then removed a tape worm from her and it died, he would only be charged with one murder," said the NOW spokesman.Satire, as it is, it's still the way some of these people think...or stink...you choose.
FMCDH
To: Caleb1411
"If he had killed his wife then removed a tape worm from her and it died, he would only be charged with one murder," said the NOW spokesman. "That is a precisely accurate analogy using irrefutable logic." Yes it is. If you believe people are just overgrown monkeys, that is.
Of course, the belief that people are just overgrown monkeys and nothing else also leads to infanticide, slavery, and tyranny.
It's always amusing to see a bunch of deviant women arguing on the basis of 'might-makes-right', pagan ethics. If they actually lived in a society based on those ethics they wouldn't occupy the positions of influence they do today because...men are stronger and meaner than women and would just force them out of the way to grab the power for themselves. Feminist buffoonery is only possible in a free society, which is only possible by rejecting might-makes-right atheistic/materialistic ethics.
Someone should have spanked these hags when they were little. I think that's the problem here. Arrested development.
25
posted on
04/22/2003 2:30:48 PM PDT
by
HumanaeVitae
(Tolerance is a necessary evil.)
To: HumanaeVitae
Ah, satire.
Fooled. But I stand by the previous post.
26
posted on
04/22/2003 2:31:29 PM PDT
by
HumanaeVitae
(Tolerance is a necessary evil.)
To: Caleb1411
"If he had killed his wife then removed a tape worm from her and it died, he would only be charged with one murder," said the NOW spokesman A precious, completely viable human life is the same as a tape worm to this ghoulish death lovers.
To: Caleb1411
Good Heavens! May Connor and Laci rest in peace.
To: Caleb1411
Funny, if the woman wants an abortion but the man doesn't, he doesn't have a choice. Now Scott has a choice but Lacy didn't. They only have a choice if the choice is what NOW wants the choice to be.
To: Caleb1411
"If he had killed his wife then removed a tape worm from her and it died, he would only be charged with one murder," said the NOW spokesman. "That is a precisely accurate analogy using irrefutable logic."
Comparing a Human BABY with a tape worm is absolutely disgusting. It is like that woman comparing 3000 deaths on 911 to chickens. Where do these people come from?
To: Caleb1411
....not far from what the psychopathic trash NOW would articulate!
31
posted on
04/22/2003 2:51:28 PM PDT
by
GrandMoM
("Vengeance is Mine , I will repay," says the Lord.)
To: scott7278
ping
To: Stone Mountain
Got it. See post 15. And 21. And the next one someone posts to me.
33
posted on
04/22/2003 2:55:29 PM PDT
by
agrace
To: All
Does this mean that NOW supports a man's right to force an abortion?
To: Caleb1411
This is in exceptionally poor taste.
35
posted on
04/22/2003 3:06:50 PM PDT
by
harrowup
To: HumanaeVitae; Caleb1411; GrandMoM; agrace; surelyclintonsbaddream; AmericaUnited
Ah, satire. Fooled. But I stand by the previous post.
As well you should. Even Ott's satirical excesses are only infinitesimally removed from the reality of NOW rhetoric and dogma. Sounds like NOW is catching some deserved flak for its soulless attack:
NOW backs away from comments by its Morris president
36
posted on
04/22/2003 3:10:07 PM PDT
by
rhema
To: Caleb1411
These people are totally whacko!!!!
37
posted on
04/22/2003 3:11:41 PM PDT
by
CyberAnt
( America - You Are The Greatest!!)
Comment #38 Removed by Moderator
To: harrowup
This is in exceptionally poor taste. See #36. When the writer's satire almost indistinguishably matches the rhetorical dissimulation of the harridans from NOW, it's the latter's grisly preoccupation with ensuring the right to death, not the former's satire, that's in poor taste.
39
posted on
04/22/2003 3:15:40 PM PDT
by
rhema
Comment #40 Removed by Moderator
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-52 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson