Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Fzob
The bill would give Department of Homeland Security, rather than the originally proposed Environmental Protection Agency, ultimate control of the program.

Looks like the Corzine's bill was a "back-door" to have the EPA control and oversee a large and important part of our countries industry under the guise of "security".

How many "drug manufacturers" would let the EPA have control over their production facilities in the name of security???

It's potentially just as great a hazard

5 posted on 04/24/2003 7:18:25 PM PDT by JZoback (Don't have such an open mind, your brain falls out)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: JZoback
Looks like the Corzine's bill was a "back-door" to have the EPA control and oversee a large and important part of our countries industry under the guise of "security".

Corzine is working over-time to get this bill passed as is. Many of the corporations identified as potential targets (Information that was confidential, but was suddenly was leaked to about 10 local papers) have recently received extremely detailed and aggressive audits by EPA people who are basically clueless about chemical manufacturing. The typical inspector are in general knowledgeable about the facilities they audit. And understand the difference between a clerical error and not following the rules. The inpections being carried out now are just trying to pile up infractions regradless of the nature or seriousness involved. This tells me Corzine has put pressure on the EPA and the DEP in order to create a laundry list of bogus noncompliances for corporations

6 posted on 04/24/2003 7:38:40 PM PDT by Fzob (Why does this tag line keep showing up?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson