Skip to comments.
Anchor (Ashleigh Banfield): Coverage was biased
The Topeka Capital-Journal ^
| 04/24/2003
| Matt Moline
Posted on 04/25/2003 1:16:19 AM PDT by KQQL
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61 next last
To: KQQL
"We didn't see what happen when Marines fired M-16s," Banfield said during a Landon lecture appearance Thursday at Kansas State University. "We didn't see what happened after mortars landed, only the puff of smoke. There were horrors that were completely left out of this war. So was this journalism? Or was this coverage?"Well, I guess if she was was really dedicated she could have volunteered to be on the receiving end. Oh wait-that would have dangerous?
To: GATOR NAVY
Let's try this again-
Well, I guess if she was was really dedicated to journalism, she could have volunteered to be on the receiving end. Oh wait-that would have been dangerous?
To: KQQL
The article doesn't mention how she was received by the audience.
23
posted on
04/25/2003 4:56:49 AM PDT
by
Carolina
To: GGpaX4DumpedTea
Peter's cousin? or illegitimate daughter?
To: KQQL
Another honest, unbiased, earnest Canadian.
is there anyway to physically separate the US from Canada? I got a chainsaw, I'm gonna go get started in Windsor, right near a cigar store with a huge picture of brother Fidel in the window. They loooove Cuba over there.
25
posted on
04/25/2003 6:03:20 AM PDT
by
Benrand
To: KQQL
Well we'll strap a camera to your keister and when we fire off a round you run up for the explosion.
To: KQQL
Well, Ms. Banfield, I remember seeing dead Iraqi soldiers lying on the ground. I assume this was from the bullets fired from that M-16.
Question for you Ms. Banfield: Did you KNOW that when a soldier fires an M-16, the bullet will kill Iraqi soldiers?
27
posted on
04/25/2003 6:14:25 AM PDT
by
Bryan24
To: KQQL
"We didn't see what happen when Marines fired M-16s... We didn't see what happened after mortars landed, only the puff of smoke. There were horrors that were completely left out of this war. So was this journalism? Or was this coverage?"There's no TV "coverage" of what happens during abortions on TV, either.
But I doubt Ms. Banfield protests the "horrors that were completely left out" in "journalistic" discussions of abortion.
To: KQQL
What a twit. CANDAIAN--that figures. Sounds like she would be right at home at Al Jazeera.
To: KQQL
Ashleigh Banfield is so freakin hot!!
To: KQQL
NBC News correspondent Ashleigh Banfield Ashleigh Banfield started her career in broadcasting in Kenora, Ontario (a town located on the north shore of Lake of the Woods ... 200 miles, or so, east of Winnipeg). She then moved up to a larger audience when she went to work for a TV station in Winnipeg. Don't recall the rest of her progression up to her present position, but the term "info babe" definite1y applies here ... now she's on the college lecture circuit ... go figure.
31
posted on
04/25/2003 6:25:00 AM PDT
by
BluH2o
To: Always Right
LOL, is that really is that what the Arabs want. Seems to me the Arabs have been hell bent to push the Jews into the sea from day 1. Yes, Ashleigh...what did the Arabs "want" when they attacked Israel in 1967...at a time when they occupied ALL of the West Bank, Gaza, and Golan, and ALL of Jerusalem--and all Jews were forbidden from stepping foot there. Were they angry at the lack of a "peace process" then?
To: KQQL
She was pissed that MSNBC kept her stateside during the war and that she lost the co-billing on "Holt and Banfield".
To: jonalvy44
Maybe so, but isn't she the one who changed her hair color to be taken more seriously?
34
posted on
04/25/2003 6:30:24 AM PDT
by
fml
(freedom begins with W!)
To: onyx
But she's smart...she wears really kool glasses.
35
posted on
04/25/2003 6:33:25 AM PDT
by
PennsylvaniaMom
(Proud that Rick Santorum is my Senator!)
To: KQQL
K-State really stuck it in Alf Landon's eye this time. They generally have former heads of state, ex-presidents, senators, etc. Banfield is just a third string talking head, they must have been desperate or dillusional to put her on.
36
posted on
04/25/2003 6:37:32 AM PDT
by
heckler
(wiskey for my men, beer for my horses ,sexy for me)
To: KQQL
According to Banfield, U.S. broadcasters don't accurately inform the American public of the basic reason behind widespread Islamic distrust of the U.S. -- the American government's continued unwillingness to treat Israelis and Palestinians as equal partners in the future of Israel. The American government's continued unwillingness to treat Israelis and Palestinians as equal partners in the future of Israel may in fact be real. But U.S. broadcasters have been all to efficient in informing the American public of the real reason. The Palestinians desire to see every Israeli man, woman and child wiped from the face of the Earth by any means possible. At least, to me that message is all too clear when they report on all the bombings and shootings.
To: KQQL
Has she ever gone into an abortion clinic and done a graphic story about what goes on in there?
38
posted on
04/25/2003 6:45:22 AM PDT
by
techcor
(Admin Moderator wannabe)
To: KQQL
'Here's what the leaders of Hezbollah, a radical Muslim group, are telling me about what is needed to bring peace to Israel,...I'll bet dollars to donuts none of her reports ever referred to Hezbollah as a "radical Muslim group".
39
posted on
04/25/2003 6:56:50 AM PDT
by
JimRed
(Disinformation is the leftist's and enemy's friend; consider the source before believing.)
To: KQQL
"Conveniently, in the week or two we were in there, it became a message of 'freeing the Iraqi people,' " Banfield said. "That should have been the message early on, in fact, six to eight months preceding this campaign, if we were trying to win over the hearts of the Arab world." No, every time Bush spoke about Iraq, he discussed both WMD and the plight of the Iraqi people. Banfield is a liar.
40
posted on
04/25/2003 7:14:24 AM PDT
by
alnick
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson