1 posted on
04/25/2003 10:25:07 PM PDT by
per loin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
To: per loin
I really wish the US would stop people coming into the country from affected areas.
To: per loin
Good article.
5 posted on
04/25/2003 10:33:30 PM PDT by
EternalHope
(Boycott everything French forever.)
To: per loin
Another excellent per loin post...I should sign off, really, because I'm in a goofy mood tonight...but I'm glad I saw this...
To: per loin
SARS won't have much of an impact here in the States with our advanced medical system and high standards of public hygiene. But if it gets past Hong Kong to much of the Third World, look out: it'll make the AIDS devastation look like a Sunday stroll in the park.
7 posted on
04/25/2003 10:36:13 PM PDT by
goldstategop
( In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
To: per loin
1 in 7. Hmmmmm. That's still a ways from 1/3 of mankind. I wonder what's coming along to fill the gap?
10 posted on
04/25/2003 10:43:20 PM PDT by
mercy
To: per loin
Is it
SARS - An extremely deadly and serious health problem.
Or is it just an old flu/cold bug that has resurfaced, but is being hyped up by WHO (another UN shame), using it as a weapon of mass distraction. This in order to distract the international media as America drains the Axis of UN Weasels, Evils, and Weevils swamp in Iraq, exposing the UN as nothing but a giant criminal enterprise. In other words:
iSARS - Ignore Seeing America Remove Saddam
Only time will tell. As of right now I choose number two, iSARS. Not anywhere near enough deaths to think of it anymore dangerous then other bugs of the past. Of course, it could be a serious plague of Biblical proportions. I'm open-minded on this subject.
19 posted on
04/25/2003 10:54:42 PM PDT by
Russell Scott
(When you ignore God's instruction, you end up in the Devil's destruction.)
To: per loin
Hell of a solution to the aging Boomer problem, though.
24 posted on
04/25/2003 11:00:10 PM PDT by
Grut
To: per loin
His research also found that Sars remains infectious much longer than other viruses. This is extremely troubling news.
To: per loin
Now I know this is bio-terror!
41 posted on
04/25/2003 11:28:26 PM PDT by
JustPiper
(Libs are oxymorons, just ask Chicago!!!)
To: per loin
okay people,now is the time to buy some plastic and tape!,
don`t make it too tight or you will not be able to walk,drive or sit at work,and do not suffocate.
To: per loin
Latest figures show that Sars has infected almost 4,649 people in 26 countries around the world and has claimed the lives of 275 people. So SARS deaths are still way behind deaths due to choking on hotdogs??
To: All
To: per loin
This article contains some tidbit that the WHO raised its own death rate slightly as well.
I have a feeling they are maneuvering to eventually bump it up to the death rate given in the British study...
To: per loin
SARS ORIGINS FOUND
Sudden
Attack on
Reason by the
State
It also replaces the rapidly declining volume of media attention given to the war, by something new for which the State is needed to save us all.
110 posted on
04/26/2003 2:43:07 AM PDT by
ido_now
To: per loin
I believe these experts "may" believe what they are quoted as saying/publishing.
To: per loin
From the article:
The World Health Organization (WHO) is currently predicting a death rate of 5% to 6% and has insisted the virus could still be beaten if countries worked together to stop it from spreading.
From the CDC Influenza Summary Update (Week ending October 20, 2001-Week 42):
The proportion of deaths attributed to pneumonia and influenza was 6.4%.
Our media is hyping SARS as a killer epidemic, and Were All Going to DIE!
And yet, the flu and pneumonia are more deadly and no one seems in a panic.
To: per loin
...the virus could still be beaten if countries worked together to stop it from spreading.But that is PRECISELY why it won't be beaten. Western democracies will fight it well, but closed nations that place no value in the life of the individual will protect the reputation of the State.
And what China has withheld may already be enough to make effective containment impossible.
136 posted on
04/26/2003 5:43:06 AM PDT by
Petronski
(I'm not always cranky.)
To: per loin
I am waiting for someone who will not worry till it kills one in four. Their reason is theirs is a family of four and one in seven will not effect them. Some people should not be allowed to breed.
To: per loin
100% of all living beings will die!
146 posted on
04/26/2003 6:08:57 AM PDT by
verity
To: Howlin
One in seven!
153 posted on
04/26/2003 7:55:34 AM PDT by
blam
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson