Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: goldstategop
Three and a smidgen over; however, most of those are " surmized " and NO deaths at all. Very unlike the ASIAN and HONG HONG flus of the past; not to mention the SPANISH INFLUENZA of 1918.
17 posted on 04/25/2003 10:53:20 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: nopardons
It's worth noting that the Spanish Influenza killed only some 2% of people who contracted it, but that it's high absolute mortality figure resulted because it spread so rapidly and effectively. If SARS indeed has a mortality rate of four to eight times higher than Spanish influenza, then it could easily kill four to five times as many people with an infection rate one quarter that of Spanish influenza. The greater number of deaths results, of course, from the worldwide demographic growth since 1918.

That's 100 million people.

Having said that, there's so much yet unresolved or unclear about this disease that I'm just in wait & see mode, myself.
107 posted on 04/26/2003 2:34:14 AM PDT by AntiGuv (™)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: nopardons
SARS reminds me a great deal of the influenza outbreak of 1918.
132 posted on 04/26/2003 5:30:27 AM PDT by sakic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson