Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: isthisnickcool
Not true. Had Red Army come East prior to Pres Reagan they had a very good chance of defeating NATO, short of nukes.We were inferior in numbers and the qualitative edge was not great enough to eliminate this numerical disparity.

By 1984 and beyond we had increased our qualitative edge and decreased the numerical differences. We also had started to develop new doctrine and weapons systems.If Red Army had made a thrust in '87 or '88 they'd have died before our guns. That was understood after Desert Storm.

The author is correct about our superiority leading others to develop nukes. Makes me think that the boys at Los Alamos and Livermore have a lot more magic in the pipeline to neutralize these wannabes.

25 posted on 04/27/2003 10:48:25 AM PDT by xkaydet65
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: xkaydet65
Not true.

What is "not true"? "I wrote "The Russians were shocked at what we did during the first gulf war." I'm not sure hat you mean because it seems you agree with me?

I assure you I'm absolutely accurate that the Russians were shocked at what we did during the first gulf war. Unless the person this information came from was incorrect. Which I doubt because that person is an adviser in the oval office today and has spoken personally with the Russian military commanders of that time.

38 posted on 04/27/2003 2:42:19 PM PDT by isthisnickcool (Now, let's go to the screen writer.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson