Regards, Ivan
Posted on 04/27/2003 2:59:07 PM PDT by MadIvan
EUROPE’S self-inflicted wounds over Iraq will be on display tomorrow when the leaders of France and Germany — dubbed the “Axis of Weasels” in America — start to try to lay the groundwork for a European Union military alliance that would compete with Nato.
At a meeting in Brussels with the Prime Ministers of Belgium and Luxembourg, President Chirac and Gerhard Schröder, the German Chancellor, want to clear the way for a common European defence system that would start with a core of volunteer states.
Although the Germans have qualms about a confrontation with Nato, the French are not hiding their aim to achieve their long-standing goal of unhitching the United States from European defence. This has become more pressing with the reported plans of the US to punish France for its stand on the war in Iraq by excluding it from Nato decision-making.
The mechanism for founding what would be a unified EU military force was tabled last week without much fanfare by the chiefs of the convention that is drafting a new EU constitution. The arrangement, akin to the foundation of monetary union, would be far more ambitious than the existing European security and defence policy that was launched by Britain and France in 1998. That policy, which includes a rapid reaction force, is limited to humanitarian, peacekeeping and crisis management in co-operation with Nato.
Although Guy Verhofstadt, the Belgian Prime Minister, proposed the mini-summit months ago, London and other EU capitals view the Brussels initiative as akin to provocation by the four most active opponents of American policy over Iraq.
Despite denials from Paris and Berlin, the session looks like a manoeuvre by French-led “old Europe” against the pro-Atlantic axis, led by Britain and Spain and featuring new EU states, which Donald Rumsfeld, the US Defence Secretary, called “new Europe”.
Britain, which has the EU’s most powerful Armed Forces, was not invited. Nor were the leaders of the EU’s other main pro-Atlantic states — Spain, Italy and the Netherlands.
Geoff Hoon, the Defence Secretary, said that the Brussels meeting “risks sending a message of division about the the creation of a defence policy separate from Nato”. Britain was adamant that the EU’s present security arrangement had nothing to do with a common defence, which was the domain of Nato, Mr Hoon told a French newspaper.
Britain is especially opposed to the French-backed idea of creating an EU military general staff, but it supports the view, shared by France and the others, that the EU needs to raise defence spending and to create a centralised arms agency, which would avoid duplication and help competition with the American defence industry.
While Europe’s split over Iraq has given impetus to the defence initiative, the project has been looming since the 1950s and in particular since President de Gaulle took France out of the Nato military structure in 1967. Differences over autonomy from Nato were buried and not resolved after M Chirac and Tony Blair launched their security initiative in St Malo in 1998.
The confrontation with the United States over Iraq was seen by M Chirac and his allies as a coming-of-age test that the expanding union had failed. To become a real power, the EU must, in their eyes, define itself as a “balance” against the United States. An independent defence force is a primary condition for confirming Europe’s identity as more than an economic bloc, they say.
The offer by several EU states and future members from the former Communist Bloc to send troops to help in the US-led occupation of Iraq is seen by the French as a setback to this ambition.
Extending the defence concept over the weekend, Michele Alliot-Marie, the French Defence Minister, sought to involve Russia, the ally of France and Germany in the anti-war front over Iraq. On a visit to Moscow, she said: “Now that a European defence is becoming reality, it is important that Russia should be associated with the planning work that we are carrying out.”
Britain and other opponents of the plan point out that even with French power, the proposed four-nation core marshals only 35 per cent of EU defence spending.
Britain is likely to oppose inclusion in the new constitution of the machinery for creating a defence alliance. Tabled by Valéry Giscard d’Estaing, who heads the convention, last week, the idea would be that “coalitions of the willing” among EU states could band together to start a military alliance that would be open to all who later desired to join.
Regards, Ivan
Hang on Ivan, you can expect a European Defense Tax in the very near future.
I'm not paying it.
Regards, Ivan
Regards, Ivan
Regards, Ivan
They tried that in 1940. It didn't take.
There are enough peacenicks and euroweenies over there to ensure that all they do is politically defend every dictator on the planet. They are already doing this. It will just be more expensive for them.
So? France should have a say in NATO which is directly in proportion to it's contribution to NATO. Which is nothing but grief. Only insanity can justify allowing such NATO decision making power to a country which supplies NOTHING militarily (and military is NATO's function) and consorts with evil dictators.
Jaques and Gerhardt seem determined to reconstitute the Holy Roman Empire. In other words, they apire to become the dictating power over the entire world. They're not much different than the Islamikazis who want to take over the world. Their methods are a little different, but the fundimental goal appears to be the same.
Oh, and a few months ago, Gerhardt promised that Germany and her friend France WILL protect EUrope from the enormous terrorist attacks they kept insisting would come if the coalition attacked Iraq (though they also said Saddam has nothing to do with terrorists)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.