Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Dini-gration of Darwinism
AgapePress ^ | April 29, 2003 | Mike S. Adams

Posted on 04/29/2003 10:43:39 AM PDT by Remedy

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 1,961-1,975 next last
To: FactQuest
True, abiogenesis is not part of the Theory of Evolution. It is, however, usually taught side-by-side with it."

You should have stopped after the first sentence. Abiogenesis is certainly not taught alongside evolutionary biology. The only place you'll typically find that is in creationist propaganda touting their viewpoint.
61 posted on 04/29/2003 1:08:01 PM PDT by whattajoke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: whattajoke
wj ...

Believe me, creation garbage is akin to this... pure nonsense that doesn't warrant a response. (So why am I doing it? ; )

fC ...

you come on a conservative site and publish this liberal garbage --- slime ?
62 posted on 04/29/2003 1:08:16 PM PDT by f.Christian (( There (( evolution )) ... but for the grace (( love // Truth )) of God --- go (( WAS )) I . ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: MEGoody
adherents to the theory get as whipped up as any adherent to a religion.

It won't be long now... with lather aplenty, Whattajoke has already started the decline.

63 posted on 04/29/2003 1:09:00 PM PDT by Dataman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: whattajoke
You hijack (( reroute )) and cut the conservative power line and then you don't want to pay the bill you are running up ?
64 posted on 04/29/2003 1:10:53 PM PDT by f.Christian (( There (( evolution )) ... but for the grace (( love // Truth )) of God --- go (( WAS )) I . ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: whattajoke
Abiogenesis is certainly not taught alongside evolutionary biology.

If you mean to say this incredible and elaborate theory was developed without any regard for its basis whatsoever, we're all snickering.

65 posted on 04/29/2003 1:15:05 PM PDT by Dataman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: whattajoke
wj ...

As has been stated here a million times, scientific debate is not meant for public spectacle. Truth be told, it's a tedious, boring exercise detailing minute facts, written out over tens of thousands of pages in hundreds of texts, journals, online resources, museum placards, etc.


fC ...

classic ... elitisim !


To: f.Christian

fC...

Originally the word liberal meant social conservatives(no govt religion--none) who advocated growth and progress---mostly technological(knowledge being absolute/unchanging)based on law--reality... UNDER GOD---the nature of GOD/man/govt. does not change.

LC...

Now I follow, thank you. Actually, I don't disagree with this at all since I see the left as abandoning the uncertianty of democracy and majority rule (( constitutional // law ))** for the assurance technocracy and expert rule (( dictatorship // tyranny ))**.

152 posted on 9/10/02 12:17 PM Pacific by Liberal Classic

** .. .. .. my additions !

Boshevik monopoly (( experts )) ... social // mind engineers ---

Brainwashing (( God // Truth )) -- Indoctrination (( lies // evolution // atheism )) !

Main Entry: tech·no·crat
Pronunciation: 'tek-n&-"krat
Function: noun
Date: 1932
1 : an adherent of technocracy
2 : a technical expert; especially : one exercising managerial authority

Main Entry: tech·noc·ra·cy
Pronunciation: tek-'nä-kr&-sE
Function: noun
Date: circa 1919
: government by technicians; specifically : management of society by technical experts





66 posted on 04/29/2003 1:15:38 PM PDT by f.Christian (( There (( evolution )) ... but for the grace (( love // Truth )) of God --- go (( WAS )) I . ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: f.Christian
FC: "you come on a conservative site and publish this liberal garbage"

It is my strong contention that science, and all its tenets, is an important part of conservatism. We consider ourselves more knowledgable and educated (well, we are) and this is all part of that. The minority of YEC's in our world do us an injustice, and make for easy ridicule from the left.
67 posted on 04/29/2003 1:16:49 PM PDT by whattajoke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: whattajoke; Dimensio
Abiogenesis is certainly not taught alongside evolutionary biology.

Puh-lease. I went round and round on this before in another forum, and found several high school biology text books that had abiogenesis in the Evolution unit.

Most biology classes, include the ones I took in HS and college, teach them one behind the other, as a cohesive whole. Some give a little lip service to the speculative nature of abiogenesis, but generally its presented as well supported by the old amino acid experiment and whatnot.
68 posted on 04/29/2003 1:17:32 PM PDT by FactQuest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: whattajoke
wj ...


We consider ourselves more knowledgable and educated (well, we are) and this is all part of that.


fC ...

I see (( puke )) !
69 posted on 04/29/2003 1:18:58 PM PDT by f.Christian (( There (( evolution )) ... but for the grace (( love // Truth )) of God --- go (( WAS )) I . ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Dataman
Nor can you authoritatively say that live evolved... for the same reasons. Dini seems to have granted himself that authority.

We can never exclude the possibility that a god created all life in the recent past but made it so that it looks as if it evolved over several million years. And of course he also planted all those fossils in the ground to lead us astray...

70 posted on 04/29/2003 1:19:04 PM PDT by BMCDA (Atheists do not so much reject God as bad arguments in His favor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Dataman
I don't speak for Dini and for all I know, his words may have been taken out of context.
I'm just relating to my own experiences in the classroom and in the field.
71 posted on 04/29/2003 1:19:39 PM PDT by stanz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: BMCDA
And of course he also planted all those fossils in the ground to lead us astray...

Shame! You know better than that. It's not the evidence that we disagree with but the interpretation of the evidence (and sometimes the evolutionist manufacturing of the evidence).

72 posted on 04/29/2003 1:22:56 PM PDT by Dataman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Dataman
Even if it were true, the childish "but they do it too!" response does not justify Dini's bigotry.

So is it bigotry when a professor fails a student who clearly hasn't done the work to pass a class? It's up to the student to retain knowledge and understand it. If the student chooses not to, that is his problem, not Dini's.

73 posted on 04/29/2003 1:23:02 PM PDT by ThinkPlease (Fortune Favors the Bold!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: MEGoody
What makes some people angry, in my opinion, is not the rejection of evolutionary tenets per se, but the insistence on non-scientific arguments in any area which are not founded on reason.
74 posted on 04/29/2003 1:23:42 PM PDT by stanz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: ThinkPlease
So is it bigotry when a professor fails a student who clearly hasn't done the work to pass a class?

You need to read up on the Dini case. What you say is not related to Dini and his bigotry.

75 posted on 04/29/2003 1:24:32 PM PDT by Dataman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Dataman
It's not the evidence that we disagree with but the interpretation of the evidence (and sometimes the evolutionist manufacturing of the evidence).

Or the complete ignoring of the evidence when it doesn't suit you.

76 posted on 04/29/2003 1:24:44 PM PDT by ThinkPlease (Fortune Favors the Bold!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: f.Christian
y'know, I was gonna take offense at you stating that my views are "liberal," but then again, I can't find one freeper who would want your garbled musings held up as a paragon of conservatism!
77 posted on 04/29/2003 1:25:11 PM PDT by whattajoke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Dataman
I'm one of the people he would not endorse. And more power to him.
78 posted on 04/29/2003 1:26:00 PM PDT by Taliesan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: stanz; MEGoody
What makes some people angry, in my opinion, is not the rejection of evolutionary tenets per se, but the insistence on non-scientific arguments in any area which are not founded on reason.

You mean like something coming from nothing?
Like life coming from non-life?
Like a complete and massive genetic code found in a bacteria?
You mean like whales trotting around on land like horses?

79 posted on 04/29/2003 1:26:53 PM PDT by Dataman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: whattajoke
Psychotic people so invested in their theories can't comprehend reality for an instant w/o crashing !
80 posted on 04/29/2003 1:31:28 PM PDT by f.Christian (( There (( evolution )) ... but for the grace (( love // Truth )) of God --- go (( WAS )) I . ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 1,961-1,975 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson