[Rebel_Ace]

To f.Christian,

I have read many of your replies, and for the life of me I cannot understand why you post things with such an arcane pattern of wording and punctuation. The whole point of posting is to COMMUNICATE with the reader. Your arguments are not well represented with the bizzare syntax you choose to implement.

For example, you stated:

"...evolution (( Godless )) is inherently stupid --- impossible !..."

Do you mean that believing in NO God is on it's face stupid, and that believing in God is automatically a sign of intelligence? Then I would have to ask, would belief in TWO Gods be even smarter? How about THREE?

A reader is left by your posts with the impression that either:

(a) English is not your first language -or-
(b) English is your first language, you just never bothered to learn the rules -or-
(c) You know the rules, but are too lazy to adhere to them while writing -or-
(d) You are masking poor or weak arguments in hard to read sentences.

COMMUNICATION ... (((talking // speaking // writing))) requires (needs // depends upon) MUTUALLY ACCEPTED Language Usage.

There, is that better?

Rebel Ace

[f.Christian]

ra ...

Do you mean that believing in NO God is on it's face stupid, and that believing in God is automatically a sign of intelligence? Then I would have to ask, would belief in TWO Gods be even smarter? How about THREE?

fC ...

good example of evo babble ---

evo logic epilepsy --- stutter // stupor // fits ! !

[Doctor Stochastic]

The whole point of posting is to COMMUNICATE with the reader.

You may have found a counter-example.

[f.Christian]

fc ...

What do you call this ...

ra ...

a sign of intelligence? Then I would have to ask, would belief in TWO Gods be even smarter? How about THREE?

fc ... zoo science --- religion // kennel !

[KCmark]

I just skip those posts.

Unreadable (!language/!syntax)=== no communication (!understand/!intelligence) ---> waste of time (better things to do)!