To: kkindt
So wait... the fossil record (planted by satan) is actually a snapshot of all those species who "devolved" to the point of extinction? And the current scientific understanding that these fossils represent a progression, of sorts, are wrong in that they *actually* show "devolved" species that didn't start out with the "top of the line" mutation/perfection dna code?
dude, I smell MAJOR grant money and awards for you! You've turned all biology, paleontology, geology, genetics, and many more on their heads! And to think... we all knew you back when you were just a freeper...
Good luck with your first peer reviewed paper!
/creationist backslapping mode>
To: whattajoke
Golly you sure know how to misunderstand what someone has said. First "fossil record" HMMMM? A "record" is suppose to be a recording of facts. What in the world facts are in the fossils that prove we evolved from tiny little microscopic creatures and how in the world do irreducibly complex biomachines come about when they are purposeless for a creature if one tiny part is not there???
Oh I think devolution of the brain is in great evidence not just for me but for you too.
391 posted on
05/02/2003 11:22:13 AM PDT by
kkindt
(knightforhire.com)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson