To: Polycarp
And it is also irrefutable that for every dollar spent on buying sterile needles, multiple dollars are spent on contraceptive/abortifacient drugs, devices, and paraphernalia that would be far better spent on basic health care measures. NO.
If population is to remain at suportable levels, then the birth rates and death rates must remain in balance. If anything, we should be spending more on birth control and less on fighting disease in most parts of the world, including the United States.
So9
34 posted on
04/30/2003 7:33:55 AM PDT by
Servant of the Nine
(Real Texicans; we're grizzled, we're grumpy and we're armed)
To: Servant of the Nine
If anything, we should be spending more on birth control and less on fighting disease in most parts of the world, including the United States. I suspect increased military spending would be more helpful.
And as for your general premise, if you believe anything from the U.N., their latest figures point to a world-wide population collapse.
39 posted on
04/30/2003 8:29:01 AM PDT by
lepton
To: Servant of the Nine
Damn!!!
You've figured out what "supportable levels" are?
Get thee to the UN. They have a job for you!!
40 posted on
04/30/2003 9:22:52 AM PDT by
ninenot
To: Servant of the Nine
we should be spending more on birth control and less on fighting disease in most parts of the world, including the United StatesYou're one sick little puppy. At least your screen name is apt.
42 posted on
04/30/2003 11:18:17 AM PDT by
Polycarp
("He who denies the existence of God, has some reason for wishing that God did not exist.")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson