To: Laurie S
They aren't allowed to marry. People aren't allowed to marry their dogs either. Does that bother you too? If not who are you to judge whether a man-dog sexual relationship is better or worse than a man-man sexual relationship? Neither of these sexual relationships is for children, just for pleasure. Where are the rights of men who want to marry their dogs? They are second class citizens with **no rights**.
49 posted on
04/30/2003 9:54:33 AM PDT by
69ConvertibleFirebird
(Never argue with an idiot. They drag you down to their level, then beat you with experience.)
To: 69ConvertibleFirebird
People aren't allowed to marry their dogs either.Government has no rightful role in marriage. People cannot marry animals, and people cannot marry others of their own sex. But it has nothing to do with government. People are married by virtue of promises before, and to, God. Not because some government says they are.
58 posted on
04/30/2003 10:23:25 AM PDT by
Protagoras
(Putting government in charge of morality is like putting pedophiles in charge of children)
To: 69ConvertibleFirebird
"People aren't allowed to marry their dogs either. Does that bother you too? If not who are you to judge whether a man-dog sexual relationship is better or worse than a man-man sexual relationship? Neither of these sexual relationships is for children, just for pleasure. Where are the rights of men who want to marry their dogs? They are second class citizens with **no rights**. "
LOL! No one's talking about non-human marriage. I think your argument classifies as 'strawman'? Do I have that right? LOL! No, whether you like it or not, gays and lesibans are human and under our constitution should have the same rights as heterosexuals.. something in the constitution about 'all men' being created equal and such. :)
God bless! :)
66 posted on
04/30/2003 11:05:38 AM PDT by
Laurie S
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson