To: AuH2ORepublican
If he's pro-abortion, I don't think he can win.
If Bumpers and Pryor can win with that stance then its really not that big of a factor in Arkansas. But Rockefeller isn't a real politician in many ways and I'm afraid he would have trouble when the campaign turned nasty, which it always does. Can taking the high road win these days?
28 posted on
05/01/2003 8:07:00 AM PDT by
Arkinsaw
To: All
29 posted on
05/01/2003 8:13:21 AM PDT by
JohnnyZ
(You can quote me on that, but I'll deny it.)
To: Arkinsaw
if Bumpers and Pryor can win with pro-choice...
they're both DEMS...Dem's can win with that. In Arkansas basically forget about a Repub winning like that.
30 posted on
05/01/2003 8:18:29 AM PDT by
votelife
(FREE MIGUEL ESTRADA!)
To: Arkinsaw; fieldmarshaldj
"If Bumpers and Pryor can win with that stance then its really not that big of a factor in Arkansas."
A Democrat can win in Arkansas even if he's not anti-abortion, but it would be nearly impossible for a pro-abortion Republican to win. The RATs start off with a huge registration advantage, and traditionally get over 90% of the black vote no matter what. For a Republican to win, he has to carry economic conservatives (which are a minority in Arkansas) and get a fairly large percentage of social conservatives who are attracted to economic populism to come over from the Democratic side. Thus, if a Republican in Arkansas is pro-abortion, he will never beat an incumbent Senator like Blanche Lincoln (who is also pro-abortion but hides it by voting for the partial-birth ban), since Lincoln's promise of more pork will keep Democrats happy and there won't be many compelling social issues to get Democrats to jump to the GOP candidate.
32 posted on
05/01/2003 8:49:10 AM PDT by
AuH2ORepublican
(Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice, moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson