[OutSpot]

"Let me get this straight: some lawyer for some fired FBI employees writes a letter claiming SHOCKING NEW EVIDENCE of McVeigh's innocence and you buy it?

I nor the article insinuated that McVeigh was innocent. Next time please don't jump to conclusions.

I am just stating that due process in the case has been severly tainted. (hence - FBI star material witness giving misleading testemony, something that has not been uncommon in the FBI's history)

[OutSpot]

>>>> PING <<<<<

[FreeTheHostages]

"Next time please don't jump to conclusions."

ROFL -- like titling a thread "BOMBSHELL" perhaps?

Seems like I'm not the one jumping. And that's precisely my point. You're a fool if you accept something as true because one lawyer says it. Lawyers are all the time issuing these "bombshell" announcements -- titling your thread in agreement with this lawyer is indeed jumping to conclusions.

And actually, I didn't say what the word was for a person who makes such leaps of faith. I just indicated the word exists. Jump to your own conclusion on what it is. :)