Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Georgians Plan Whites-Only Prom Party
Associated Press ^ | 05-01-03

Posted on 05/01/2003 11:47:05 AM PDT by Brian S

ALBANY, Ga. May 1 — A year after holding their first integrated prom, some students at Taylor County High School have decided to again hold a separate, private party for whites only.

While many whites say they still plan to attend next week's integrated prom, the decision to hold the whites-only prom this Friday saddened senior Gerica McCrary, who helped organize last year's dance.

"I cried," said McCrary, who is black. "The black juniors said, 'Our prom is open to everyone. If you want to come, come.'"

Juniors are in charge of planning the prom each year and last year they decided to have just one dance the first integrated prom in 31 years in the rural Georgia county 150 miles south of Atlanta.

Until then, parents and students organized separate proms for whites and blacks after school officials stopped sponsoring dances, in part because they wanted to avoid problems arising from interracial dating.

This year, a small number of white juniors decided they wanted a separate prom.

"They influenced the others," said McCrary, who plans to major in biology at Columbus State University. "They didn't vote on anything. They said, 'This is what we're going to do.'"

The school has 439 students, 232 of them black. McCrary and a white friend passed out fliers informing students of all races that they would be welcome at the May 9 prom at nearby Fort Valley State University.

The private prom is Friday night 50 miles away in Columbus.

Erin Posey, a white senior, said the entire junior class joined together in hosting last year's prom, but this year's junior class wasn't as unified.

"I think a lot of seniors were disappointed," she said. "Now we have to choose between two groups of friends."

Posey plans to attend both proms.

"I had some white friends who were not going to the other (inclusive) prom," she said. "I wanted to have time with everybody. I'll have a lot of (black) friends there, too. A lot more of the seniors are going to be at the mixed one."

After school integration, separate proms were common in the rural South, but Taylor County was among the last to cling to the practice.

Glenda Latimore, a 1972 graduate, was in the first class to have separate black and white proms. Now her 16-year-old son, Gerard, is preparing for prom night.

As the black junior class president, her son helped organize the open-to-all prom. The class also has a white president.

"I would have liked to see it together this year," said Latimore, an outfielder on the school's baseball team. "My class would have, too. It just didn't happen this year."

Glenda Latimore said relatives in Philadelphia and New Jersey laugh when they read about Taylor County's prom. She said residents here are "nice and friendly," but they still have a problem with proms.

"It seems like it's something secret," she said. "The white people are afraid to speak up against the separation.

"But I went to a black prom and I had fun," she said. "It didn't kill me, so I tell my son, 'Just go to the prom and have fun. Don't come out hating anyone.'"


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; US: Georgia
KEYWORDS: gaprom
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-200 ... 301-349 next last

1 posted on 05/01/2003 11:47:06 AM PDT by Brian S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Brian S
That's just wrong.
2 posted on 05/01/2003 11:49:29 AM PDT by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brian S
Somebody please check for me what year it is?
3 posted on 05/01/2003 11:49:49 AM PDT by The Old Hoosier (Right makes might.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brian S
What?
4 posted on 05/01/2003 11:50:01 AM PDT by Fraulein
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brian S
its their right to have their own white only prom just as its my right to think of them as being just as stupid as those who want gays only graduations or blacks only college dorms.
5 posted on 05/01/2003 11:50:30 AM PDT by KantianBurke (The Federal govt should be protecting us from terrorists, not handing out goodies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brian S
Is Superman up there turning the world backwards again. I told him to stop that. Lois is just moving on. he is going to have to live with it. GOSH...
6 posted on 05/01/2003 11:51:37 AM PDT by grapeape (Hope is not a method. - Gen. Hugh Sheldon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fraulein
It's called freedom of association.
7 posted on 05/01/2003 11:51:50 AM PDT by Guillermo (Sic 'em!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Brian S
What a shame. I hope they have a change of heart. This is 2003.
8 posted on 05/01/2003 11:51:58 AM PDT by Bigg Red
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KantianBurke; Guillermo
I don't think anyone is arguing 'their rights'....only the morality that it reflects. It's wrong.
9 posted on 05/01/2003 11:53:38 AM PDT by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Brian S
It's just some cliquey teenagers exercising their God-given right to be stupid.

I wonder where the parents are in all this?
10 posted on 05/01/2003 11:55:51 AM PDT by headsonpikes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Guillermo
It's called freedom of association.

I totally agree with "freedom of association." I just happen to think that one is quite an idiot if they are unable to come up with any traits other than skin color to decide who to associate with.

11 posted on 05/01/2003 11:57:25 AM PDT by Onelifetogive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Bigg Red
They may have a right not to associate with someone because of their skin color on their own time but they are wrong in what they are doing. I hope they at least take their hoods off at the door when they get to their "whites only" party. It's enough to make you want to vomit.
12 posted on 05/01/2003 11:57:41 AM PDT by never4get
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Brian S
I don't have as much of a problem with this as I did with a high school in my area that refused to admit racially mixed couples.
13 posted on 05/01/2003 11:57:43 AM PDT by geaux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: anniegetyourgun
never said it was a moral thing to do. Its not. But they do have the freedom of association however badly or immorally they use it.
14 posted on 05/01/2003 11:58:00 AM PDT by KantianBurke (The Federal govt should be protecting us from terrorists, not handing out goodies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Brian S
Is the date on this 2003 or 1903?

Man, what a whacked out world we live in. The best golfer in the world is a black dude, the best rapper is a white guy and you have these "Gone With The Wind" throwbacks having a "White's Only" prom (and before you flame me, I'm just as disgusted by "black only" type events)!!??

A privately owned club is one thing, this is entirely another. It's stuff like this that kills us when we try to argue against affirmative action and other race-based policies.

All this is because of "inter-racial dating problems"? I can tell you one thing, I'm glad my kid isn't growing up in some "cracker-barrell" community like Albany, GA. These folks are a piece of work.

15 posted on 05/01/2003 11:59:11 AM PDT by Zansman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Guillermo
Because the school is about 50-50, in this case, it is freedom of association. However, if a majority (80-90%) decides to separate, it's more like a boycott. For example, if 90% was white (or black) and they had a separate prom, barring the other 10 %, it would not be much of a prom for those being boycotted. This school has about 100 people in each class, if it were 90% white and the proms were separate, that would leave about 10 people left to have their own "prom". That is hardly freedom of association. That would be more like blackballing.
16 posted on 05/01/2003 12:00:07 PM PDT by staytrue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: anniegetyourgun
As the black junior class president, her son helped organize the open-to-all prom. The class also has a white president.

And...

"It seems like it's something secret," she said. "The white people are afraid to speak up against the separation.

Then you said...

That's just wrong.

But with the school sanctioned level of segregation apparent in the article, not entirely unexpected. The racial tit-for-tat that seems to be the S.O.P. in this school invites this kind of crap..JFK

17 posted on 05/01/2003 12:00:51 PM PDT by BADROTOFINGER (Life sucks. Get a helmet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Brian S
Oh great. Sure helps Georgia's backward image. Just what we need.

Kudos to the teens who invited everyone.

18 posted on 05/01/2003 12:00:55 PM PDT by kcordell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Old Hoosier
I know when I graduated in 1977 in Gadsden AL a whites-only prom was unheard of. We were completely integrated. However, the whites danced with whites and the blacks danced with blacks. Nowadays that has changed, but still having an exclusionary event seems terribly backwards. I suppose the ones who go on to college within the next couple of years will pledge to a frat and continue on their merry exclusionary way. By the way, at the risk of getting hammered by the English grammar Nazis out there, is exclusionary a word? Don't have a dictionary handy.
19 posted on 05/01/2003 12:01:17 PM PDT by Laura Earl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Brian S
Dumb. I guess they have the right to do this, since it's a private party, but what a stupid idea. Here these kids go to school all year long together, but some of the white kids want to have a dance that excludes half of the school's students because they're a different color.

Archaic, stupid, and ignorant.
20 posted on 05/01/2003 12:01:26 PM PDT by MineralMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brian S
Problems of inter-racial dating?

My white mother married my Native American father.

Sure glad she didn't have hicks in her family.
21 posted on 05/01/2003 12:01:54 PM PDT by mabelkitty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KantianBurke
Not if this is a public school.
22 posted on 05/01/2003 12:02:59 PM PDT by mabelkitty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Onelifetogive
I don't understand why this is upsetting to Freepers. Didn't we just decide that it was okay to keep women out of golf clubs? By the same reasoning it's okay to keep blacks out of proms. Where's Hootie? He'll explain it all.
23 posted on 05/01/2003 12:03:22 PM PDT by ladyjane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Brian S
C-SPAN had a phone-in segment a few days ago where they only accepted calls from minorities.
24 posted on 05/01/2003 12:03:23 PM PDT by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Onelifetogive
Agreed.
25 posted on 05/01/2003 12:03:58 PM PDT by Guillermo (Sic 'em!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: mabelkitty
the bi-racial prom that's being organizd by the school is public. The racist one is technically a private party. Thus they have every right to act like rednecks and we have every right to call them on it.
26 posted on 05/01/2003 12:04:34 PM PDT by KantianBurke (The Federal govt should be protecting us from terrorists, not handing out goodies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: mabelkitty
It's not on public school grounds...
27 posted on 05/01/2003 12:04:39 PM PDT by Guillermo (Sic 'em!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: headsonpikes
Me thinks the parents put the Juniors up to this because they are hicks.

I bet those six families were conniving about how to plan this all year.
28 posted on 05/01/2003 12:05:41 PM PDT by mabelkitty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: stand watie
Oh, goodness. They're gonna destroy our heritage.
29 posted on 05/01/2003 12:06:15 PM PDT by lugsoul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: geaux
Jeez! Are you kidding me?

I must be out of the loop big time (I don't have kids).
30 posted on 05/01/2003 12:06:35 PM PDT by mabelkitty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: staytrue
No matter what the percentages are, it will always be freedom of association.

No one has a right to go to a private party they are not invited to.
31 posted on 05/01/2003 12:06:59 PM PDT by Guillermo (Sic 'em!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: mabelkitty
"Me thinks the parents put the Juniors up to this because they are hicks.

I bet those six families were conniving about how to plan this all year."

I'll bet you're right. What a sad thing for their children, to have to grow up in a racist household. I do hope they learn better when they move out and grow up.

Dumb, dumb, dumb.
32 posted on 05/01/2003 12:07:17 PM PDT by MineralMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: BADROTOFINGER
Good point. I missed that.

This is bizarre.
33 posted on 05/01/2003 12:08:14 PM PDT by mabelkitty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Guillermo
"No one has a right to go to a private party they are not invited to."

I don't think anyone's arguing with that. It's just that what these kids are doing is just stupid. They can do it if they want, but it'd be really nice if nobody showed up for their little racist prom.
34 posted on 05/01/2003 12:08:37 PM PDT by MineralMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

Comment #35 Removed by Moderator

To: ladyjane
Private club, public school.

Big difference.
36 posted on 05/01/2003 12:09:41 PM PDT by mabelkitty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: anniegetyourgun
nah, it is just "freedom of association" as protected under the 1stAmendment, so it isn't "wrong".
It does appear to be silly, however.
*shrugging*
37 posted on 05/01/2003 12:09:48 PM PDT by demosthenes the elder (If *I* can afford $5/month to support FR: SO CAN YOU)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mabelkitty
I don't think you're the one who's out of the loop; I think that highschool is the one that needs to catch up with the times. The thing that really surprised me was that the ACLU was nowhere to be seen.
38 posted on 05/01/2003 12:10:02 PM PDT by geaux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Guillermo
I understand that. I'm just surprised that in the year 2003 anything like freedom of association still exists. I'm surprised that lawyers haven't already flocked to the scene. Shocked, I tell ya!
39 posted on 05/01/2003 12:10:03 PM PDT by Fraulein
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: KantianBurke
I got it.
40 posted on 05/01/2003 12:10:14 PM PDT by mabelkitty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: The Old Hoosier
"Somebody please check for me what year it is?"

LOL!!! I was thinking the same thing! I can't believe this. A school Prom is a school Prom, its all about your classmates celebrating, NOT about color - white or black. This is wild.....
41 posted on 05/01/2003 12:10:23 PM PDT by FeliciaCat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: mabelkitty
"I bet those six families were conniving..."

I'd like to think most juniors aren't quite so controlled by inbred relatives.
42 posted on 05/01/2003 12:10:27 PM PDT by headsonpikes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: mhking
please stop by for a looksie.
43 posted on 05/01/2003 12:10:36 PM PDT by demosthenes the elder (If *I* can afford $5/month to support FR: SO CAN YOU)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: MineralMan
They can do it if they want, but it'd be really nice if nobody showed up for their little racist prom.

It'd be even nicer if (white) kids opposed to this showed up with black dates. :-)

44 posted on 05/01/2003 12:10:58 PM PDT by adx (Will produce tag lines for beer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: geaux
"The thing that really surprised me was that the ACLU was nowhere to be seen."

There's no role here for the ACLU. The school prom isn't segregated. It's a private dance that's segregated. The kids can do that if they want, no matter how stupid it is.
45 posted on 05/01/2003 12:11:25 PM PDT by MineralMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: ladyjane
I don't understand why this is upsetting to Freepers. Didn't we just decide that it was okay to keep women out of golf clubs? By the same reasoning it's okay to keep blacks out of proms.

I could explain how it's not the same...but it would be a twisted and tortured, hillary-like explanation. I think I'll just say "Good point" instead.

46 posted on 05/01/2003 12:11:43 PM PDT by Onelifetogive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

Comment #47 Removed by Moderator

To: mabelkitty
My white mother married my Native American father. Sure glad she didn't have hicks in her family.

Are you implying that only whites are hicks?

48 posted on 05/01/2003 12:12:14 PM PDT by kevao
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

Comment #49 Removed by Moderator

To: Fraulein
Im sure there are many who would want this type of party outlawed.

Left wingers only believe in freedom of association, as long as perverts, transexuals, homosexuals, etc are allowed to join.
50 posted on 05/01/2003 12:14:01 PM PDT by Guillermo (Sic 'em!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-200 ... 301-349 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson