Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rageh Omaar [BBC's Peter Arnett]’s helpful friend in Baghdad
The Times (UK) ^ | May 02, 2003 | Richard Beeston

Posted on 05/01/2003 7:00:16 PM PDT by aculeus

RAGEH OMAAR, the BBC’s star correspondent in Baghdad during the Iraq war, developed a close and potentially embarrassing relationship with the director of Iraq’s Ministry of Information, who was responsible for controlling foreign correspondents.

Documents retrieved by The Times from the ministry show that Mr Omaar wrote effusive letters to Uday al-Taie, who was close to Saddam Hussein and once expelled from France for spying.

Since the collapse of the regime he has disappeared, but his files on hundreds of correspondents, whom he screened with the Iraqi Intelligence Service, remain intact in the looted Information Ministry building.

All Western journalists were obliged to show deference to the Iraqi authorities, but Mr Omaar showed himself to be a master of the art. After one trip he wrote that the high point had been a dinner with Mr al-Taie: “After promising and promising to have dinner with you for such a long time — we finally did it. Alhamdullilah!!!!! For me, this was the main achievement of my visit.”

The tactic seemed to work. A note in Arabic on the letter suggests that it be forwarded to the visa department. Before another assignment, Mr Omaar wrote: “It’s been such a long time since we last saw each other, and I would really like to see you again. As you once said to me: Once you have tasted the waters of the Tigris, you can never forget Baghdad!!!” Journalists working in Iraq often had to bribe and flatter the authorities to get visas and remain in the country. Those who wrote negative stories were blacklisted and those permitted to stay had to pull punches, particularly avoiding writing about the ruling family and sensitive subjects such as human rights abuses. The letters nonetheless give ammunition to the BBC’s critics.

Mr Omaar, who was nicknamed the “Scud Stud” for his vivid reports, declined to comment on the letters, but the BBC said that they showed him behaving in an entirely professional manner.

“These are the kind of letters that a journalist sends when he is building up a relationship with an individual who controls the access to allow him to report,” a spokesman said. “He is asking for something and doing so in an entirely professional manner.”

Mr Omaar was criticised for placing too much credence in official statements from Baghdad. But the BBC has defended him, saying that most viewers will have beenwere impressed by his “courage and the cool-headed reporting” during the conflict.

His live report as Saddam’s statue in central Baghdad was pulled down was watched by four million viewers on BBC One.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 05/01/2003 7:00:16 PM PDT by aculeus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: aculeus
Watch out for the Trojan Horse. It bites.
2 posted on 05/01/2003 7:04:24 PM PDT by Free ThinkerNY (((Lunacy and Leftism go hand in hand)))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dighton; general_re; Happygal; MadIvan
And Dyke (head of BBC) had the nerve to criticize US television coverage.
3 posted on 05/01/2003 7:06:39 PM PDT by aculeus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Admin Moderator
This from The Times (UK).

Could you kindly fix my error?

Many thanks.
4 posted on 05/01/2003 7:09:26 PM PDT by aculeus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aculeus
BBC = Bull Baloney Clowns
5 posted on 05/01/2003 7:10:28 PM PDT by observer5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aculeus
What ever happened to Arnett?
6 posted on 05/01/2003 7:10:44 PM PDT by Shermy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aculeus
Mr Omaar, who was nicknamed the “Scud Stud” for his vivid reports

?

No, that nickname went to some guy working for CNN during Gulf War I.

7 posted on 05/01/2003 7:13:17 PM PDT by xm177e2 (Stalinists, Maoists, Ba'athists, Pacifists: Why are they always on the same side?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shermy
He's writing for The Mirror, for at least one other Arab newspaper, and he's working for Greek state TV (I think)
8 posted on 05/01/2003 7:13:55 PM PDT by xm177e2 (Stalinists, Maoists, Ba'athists, Pacifists: Why are they always on the same side?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: xm177e2
I thought the Scud Stud was Arthur Kent, who is still seen as host on cable history shows. Sadly his fame never progressed much after the Gulf War, but he still looks good to me.
9 posted on 05/01/2003 7:50:10 PM PDT by Moonmad27 ("Run free, Samurai Jack")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Moonmad27
Yes I belive you are right, then NBC wanted him to go on an assignment and he refused.
10 posted on 05/01/2003 9:07:12 PM PDT by Empireoftheatom48 (God bless our troops!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson