Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/02/2003 12:41:01 PM PDT by RandDisciple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021 last
To: RandDisciple
Of the three judge panel, one said the complete law is un-Constitutional; another female judge ( A Clinton appointee) said it is Constitutional; the last judge decided to re-write the law making it both Un- and Constitutional. Only the first judge got it right. It is purely un-Constitutional and I hope the Supremes will get it eliminated.
225 posted on 05/05/2003 4:01:13 PM PDT by Paulus Invictus (ax accountant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson