Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: UCFRoadWarrior
Hillary will run in 2004...

I disagree. I don't think she wants to run against GWB.

The reason she ran in NY because she knew it was the only state she had a chance. She would lose in most states....and by wide margins.

I agree totally with this. Also, NY has virtually no residency requirement and she had the benefit of running against the "B-team".

16 posted on 05/04/2003 4:21:41 AM PDT by libertylover (Grateful to all who have served.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: libertylover
The reason she ran in NY because she knew it was the only state she had a chance. She would lose in most states....and by wide margins. I agree totally with this

I think this is wishful thinking on your part.

If the race were held today, HRC would get 40-43% of the vote nationwide.

Now consider-do you know any group of 100 people where 43 of them would vote for HRC?

No, you don't, and neither do I-so we both are substantially underdiscerning the HRC vote.

Add to this that she will have (media) air superiority and that her campaign will be very unconventional in design, relying on deception and "shock and awe" (see my post #17), and there is ample reason to worry.

19 posted on 05/04/2003 4:26:06 AM PDT by Jim Noble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson