Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.N. delegates can't agree on what terrorism is
Atlanta Journal-Constitution ^ | April 29, 2003 | ROWLAND NETHAWAY

Posted on 05/05/2003 1:34:53 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife

In the ancient land now called Iraq, the Bible describes how a group of people came together to build a city with an immense tower that would reach to heaven.

Work on this great temple-tower, or ziggurat, was well under way when God confounded the tongues of the people so they did not understand one another's speech.

Unable to make sense from their attempts to communicate, the people of that early Babylonian enterprise, according to Genesis 11: 1-9, scattered throughout the world.

The descendants of those people who constructed the Tower of Babel have regrouped in the United Nations. They still cannot understand one another's speech.

That failure to communicate erodes the foundation of the international body, foils the war on terrorism, inhibits U.S. efforts to build a fair and equitable democracy in Iraq and threatens to blow up the road map for peace just handed to Palestinian and Israeli leaders.

In the Alice in Wonderland world of the United Nations, the delegates cannot agree on the meaning of the word "terrorism."

On this side of the United Nations rabbit hole, terrorism is the use of terror as a means to cause intense fear, to demoralize, to intimidate, to subjugate or to coerce, especially for political purposes.

In a sane world, it would be obvious that suicide bombers who repeatedly blow up busloads of innocent people are practicing terrorism. The United Nations cannot accept that definition.

Even after Osama bin-Laden's al-Qaida terrorists crashed four hijacked airliners and slaughtered more than 3,000 innocent citizens on Sept. 11, 2001, the General Assembly of United Nations could not agree on a complete terrorism strategy.

Writing in the Wall Street Journal, Anne Bayefsky, adjunct professor at Columbia University Law School, professor of political science at York University, Toronto, and a member of the governing board of U.N. Watch, said attempts to arrive at a consensus on terrorism are consistently blocked, especially by Arab and Islamic nations.

Bayefsky reports that Saudi Arabia recently expressed the prevailing sentiment of many U.N. members by arguing "we should distinguish between the phenomenon of terrorism and the right of peoples to achieve self-determination."

Syria, a nation that supports terrorism and even controls its own terrorist incubator in Lebanon, is a member of the Security Council where it works to block U.N. Resolution 1373, designed to encourage states to combat terrorism after the Sept. 11 attacks.

Defying all measures of reason, Syria denies any involvement with terrorism.

Another example of the up-is-down babble coming out of the United Nations is the fact that Libya, a despotic rogue state and terrorist breeding ground, now chairs the U.N. Human Rights Commission. Other members include China, Saudi Arabia, Cuba, Sudan and Zimbabwe.

Cuba, which has been in the news for gross human rights violations involving kangaroo-court executions and imprisonment of librarians, journalists and political dissenters, was recently re-elected to the U.N. Human Rights Commission.

The delegate from Cuba's repressive regime on the commission called for sanctions against the United States for "massive and flagrant violations of human rights."

Sudan, a country that practices slavery, torture and routine mutilation of its citizens, recently had U.N. reports of its abuses dropped thanks to the U.N. Human Rights Commission.

Also recently, the same commission sanctioned the use of "all available means including armed struggle" against Israel. The U.N. human rights commission approved suicide bombings and terrorism.

The Tower of Babel is with us still.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: antiamerican; homocidebombings; humanrights; ineffectiveun; iraqifreedom; israel; sudan; terrorism

1 posted on 05/05/2003 1:34:54 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: All

2 posted on 05/05/2003 1:40:17 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
the delegates cannot agree on the meaning of the word "terrorism."

And we're supposed to trust them to fight terrorism?

Move the U.N. to Paris where it belongs.

3 posted on 05/05/2003 1:48:23 AM PDT by kcordell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
Idiots.

Terrorosm is a tactic. It could theoretically be used for good ends, although I can't think of an example.

For instance, suicide bomber Jews could have attacked German civilian targets in 1935 Germany. They would have been terrorists because they were targetting civilians, not because their cause was evil.

BTW, I don't consider those who attack their enemy's troops, as the Fedayeen Saddam attacked coalition troops, to be terrorists, regardless of whether they are wearing formal uniforms. They may be illegal combatants and might be properly liable to summary execution, but they are not terrorists.
4 posted on 05/05/2003 1:49:14 AM PDT by Restorer (TANSTAAFL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kcordell
They just pollute NY.
5 posted on 05/05/2003 1:50:19 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Restorer
I'll go along with that. But what are they now?
6 posted on 05/05/2003 1:51:16 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
If they attack civilians, they are terrorists.

Our soldiers signed up to fight. They can take care of themselves. Those who attack them are not terrorists, although they are usually soon dead.
7 posted on 05/05/2003 2:09:17 AM PDT by Restorer (TANSTAAFL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Restorer
So they're freedom fighters, rebels....what? Because our soldiers are going after them, shouldn't mean they get a legitimate status.
8 posted on 05/05/2003 2:20:49 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: All

Nabiha Mohammad Abboud wailed after finding the identity card of her sister, Hayat, at a mass grave site in Hillah. The graves are believed to date to 1991. (Globe Staff Photo/Dominic Chavez)
9 posted on 05/05/2003 2:22:54 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: kcordell
The UN, by the way, someone needs to tell KING KOFFIE that they are killing each other in Africa, again.
10 posted on 05/05/2003 2:32:34 AM PDT by gulfcoast6 (The poorest of all men is not the man without a cent but the man without a dream.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: gulfcoast6
African leaders to meet with Mugabe - Have they had enough?
11 posted on 05/05/2003 3:27:36 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
But the UN people sure know what looting is.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/905240/posts?q=1&&page=101

This needs to be linked to all future UN threads.
12 posted on 05/05/2003 3:43:41 AM PDT by Hillarys Gate Cult ("Read Hillary's hips. I never had sex with that woman.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
CW: Thanks! 10 paragraphs saved - all the proof anyone needs that the UN is useless.

Even after Osama bin-Laden's al-Qaida terrorists crashed four hijacked airliners and slaughtered more than 3,000 innocent citizens on Sept. 11, 2001, the General Assembly of United Nations could not agree on a complete terrorism strategy.

Writing in the Wall Street Journal, Anne Bayefsky, adjunct professor at Columbia University Law School, professor of political science at York University, Toronto, and a member of the governing board of U.N. Watch, said attempts to arrive at a consensus on terrorism are consistently blocked, especially by Arab and Islamic nations.

Bayefsky reports that Saudi Arabia recently expressed the prevailing sentiment of many U.N. members by arguing "we should distinguish between the phenomenon of terrorism and the right of peoples to achieve self-determination."

Syria, a nation that supports terrorism and even controls its own terrorist incubator in Lebanon, is a member of the Security Council where it works to block U.N. Resolution 1373, designed to encourage states to combat terrorism after the Sept. 11 attacks.

Defying all measures of reason, Syria denies any involvement with terrorism.

Another example of the up-is-down babble coming out of the United Nations is the fact that Libya, a despotic rogue state and terrorist breeding ground, now chairs the U.N. Human Rights Commission. Other members include China, Saudi Arabia, Cuba, Sudan and Zimbabwe.

Cuba, which has been in the news for gross human rights violations involving kangaroo-court executions and imprisonment of librarians, journalists and political dissenters, was recently re-elected to the U.N. Human Rights Commission.

The delegate from Cuba's repressive regime on the commission called for sanctions against the United States for "massive and flagrant violations of human rights."

Sudan, a country that practices slavery, torture and routine mutilation of its citizens, recently had U.N. reports of its abuses dropped thanks to the U.N. Human Rights Commission.

Also recently, the same commission sanctioned the use of "all available means including armed struggle" against Israel. The U.N. human rights commission approved suicide bombings and terrorism.



13 posted on 05/05/2003 5:46:07 AM PDT by Tunehead54 (Support Our Troops!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
bttt
14 posted on 05/05/2003 1:00:02 PM PDT by Tailgunner Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson