Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Shooter 2.5
It makes a lot more sense than selecting a leader based on whichever of the two political hacks selected by the establishment are regarded as the "lesser evil" by a plurality of those who show up on Election Day, as modified by a shadowy "Electoral College." Elections determine who was the most successful campaigner, not who is going to be the best at running the country. Monarchy of course does not guarantee that rulers will be good, but neither does any other system.
97 posted on 05/05/2003 11:09:41 AM PDT by royalcello
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies ]


To: royalcello
The system that America enjoys is based on checks and balances.

The elected officials didn't suddenly decide to run for the presidency with no prior experiences. The Ross Perot's are treated like an amusing sideshow and even then candidates like Perot and Forbes have proven themselves in the politics of business. America's Business is Business was already a famous quote. America's politicians start as mayors, congressmen or even a Attorney General.

Even if we had a Clinton that decided he wanted to be a King, if a bullet didn't find him in the next hour, Congress and the Senate would start legal proceedings.

105 posted on 05/05/2003 11:29:06 AM PDT by Shooter 2.5 (Don't punch holes in the lifeboat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson