[tuna_battle_slight_return]

O'Reilly just went over this five minutes ago. He was shocked at the results. He believes Bush does owe an explanation if WMD are not found.

[billbears]

And you don't? Better check the State of the Union address Bush gave in January. His one and only reason was that if Hussein did not disarm. Mind you, he gave side effects that would be good for the people of Iraq, but he clearly stated it was to disarm Hussein

We will consult. But let there be no misunderstanding: If Saddam Hussein does not fully disarm, for the safety of our people and for the peace of the world, we will lead a coalition to disarm him--State of the Union

Note he doesn't say for regime change, he doesn't say for freeing Iraqis, he doesn't say the Army of these US would go for any other reason but to disarm Hussein.

If O'Reilly calls him on this I'll be suprised and maybe it would add for me a notch of respect for him

[TLBSHOW]

No President Bush does not owe anyone an explanation on this matter.

[plain talk]

I'm not shocked based on the way the question was phrased.