Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mexico Fires (Int'l Secondhand Smoke)
San Antonio Express ^ | 5/3/2003 | Christopher Anderson

Posted on 05/06/2003 7:18:24 AM PDT by sam_paine

Mexico fires again cited as cause of area's haze
 

San Antonio Express-News

 

Web Posted : 05/03/2003 12:00 AM

 
Smoke from fires in Mexico and Central America is causing the gray haze hanging over San Antonio and much of Texas, state environmental officials said.

And it looks like the imported air pollution will become even more apparent in coming days.

"We're beginning to see a lot of that coming over," said Richard Garcia, director of the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality's regional office in San Antonio. "There's a dry front, and the wind is blowing this direction."

Bryan Lambeth, a meteorologist for the agency, said the amount of smoke from the south that started drifting noticeably into South Texas and Central Texas on Thursday is as high as it's been since 1998.

In May of that year, suffocating smoke originating from an inordinate number of Mexican agricultural burns and wildfires triggered three weeks' worth of health alerts in Texas and smudged the sky over much of the United States and parts of Canada.

It also intensified ozone levels in San Antonio to such a degree that the Environmental Protection Agency excused several high ozone readings.

Lambeth said ozone levels remain relatively low for now and relatively unchanged by the imported smoke.

When excessive, ozone can cause health problems — especially for children, the elderly and people with breathing difficulties.

Lambeth said a bigger concern is likely to be particulate matter in the smoke itself. Such airborne particles can aggravate asthma, cause coughing, make breathing painful and lead to bronchitis and decreased lung function.

While air monitors are detecting increased levels of particulate matter, they have not yet reached levels that the Environmental Protection Agency considers a threat to sensitive groups.

That could change. More smoke from slash-and-burn agriculture and other fires in Mexico and Central America is expected to arrive in Texas starting Sunday and continuing into the week because of stronger winds.

"It looks like the heavy smoke production is continuing, and we haven't really had the worst-case wind pattern yet," Lambeth said. "It does look like the worst-case wind patterns will be here Sunday, Monday and Tuesday."


canderson@express-news.net

 
05/03/2003



TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: cigarettes; epa; secondhandsmoke; smoke; tobacco
This is apparently not a problem for environmentalists who are worried about second hand smoke from tiny little cigarettes.

Think about it: all second hand smoke can only be a fraction of all the tobacco fields in the US south on fire at once.  

This is all of Mexico and Guatemala....and burning really wierd trees and plants, too.

  Surely this smudgy sky is more dangerous than smoke at a bar on Fridays. Nope, the enviro-whackos don't care because this fire does not benefit corporations. So it's benevolent smoke.  

What we need is to restart the old Ford 8N tractor lines, kick out a bunch of brand new 50-yr-old low-tech tractors and brush-hawgs for $1000/pop and give 100,000 of them to farmers in Mexico so they can "selectively" mow and quit setting their country on fire to clear it.   (And take that $100M spent "creating jobs for the environment" away from the EPA budget.....)  

1 posted on 05/06/2003 7:18:24 AM PDT by sam_paine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sam_paine
...yeah, i was wondering when the tree huggers were going to start their mass protests, sit-ins, and other such demonstrations against this muck in the sky...friggin' hypocrites, as usual...
2 posted on 05/06/2003 7:23:07 AM PDT by cweese
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cweese
Flying into Mexico City, you can smell the city's trash incinerators hundreds of miles out while you're still aboard the airplane.
3 posted on 05/06/2003 8:35:45 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sam_paine
The smoke this year isn't as bad a two years ago.
4 posted on 05/06/2003 9:33:45 AM PDT by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative
I thought it was 1998 that it was really bad.

I don't ever recall it like that growing up in the 70's or 80's, tho. Do you?
5 posted on 05/06/2003 10:03:05 AM PDT by sam_paine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: sam_paine
I thought it was 1998 that it was really bad.

I don't ever recall it like that growing up in the 70's or 80's, tho. Do you?

Yes 1998 was the absolute worst. You're right I can't remember it being that bad during the 70's and 80's. I think it is worst during drought years, because there is no opportunity for rain to cleans the dust and soot particles from the atmosphere.

6 posted on 05/06/2003 10:09:44 AM PDT by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: sam_paine

Carbon monoxide concentration from Yucatan fires

For the color scale, go here:

Pollution from Fires in Central America

7 posted on 05/06/2003 1:03:40 PM PDT by cogitator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson