To: chance33_98
We should use Logic Retardant to fight fires, then, and drop environmentalists on them. After all, human beings are mostly water.
2 posted on
05/07/2003 12:12:22 AM PDT by
xm177e2
(Stalinists, Maoists, Ba'athists, Pacifists: Why are they always on the same side?)
To: chance33_98
Environmentalists should become human shields against fire for the forrests in my opinion!
4 posted on
05/07/2003 12:30:15 AM PDT by
A CA Guy
(God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
To: chance33_98
If an environmentalist's home is in the path of a forest fire, let it burn.
Then listen to them howl "We didn't mean OUR property; just the other guy's!"
5 posted on
05/07/2003 1:05:19 AM PDT by
petuniasevan
(I am McGarrett of Borg. Assimilate 'em, Danno!)
To: chance33_98
"Environmentalists may sue"
Do they do anything else?
To: chance33_98; marsh2; dixiechick2000; Mama_Bear; poet; doug from upland; WolfsView; Issaquahking; ...
rights/farms/environment ping.
If you want on or off this list, just let me know.
8 posted on
05/07/2003 8:16:41 AM PDT by
farmfriend
( Isaiah 55:10,11)
To: chance33_98
21 fish.
If the fire crosses into the next watershed and the fuel load is typical, there will be thousands of tons of mud in the streams that will render them lifeless for years.
9 posted on
05/07/2003 8:22:10 AM PDT by
Carry_Okie
(The environment is too complex and too important to be managed by politics.)
To: chance33_98; samanella
bump and ping!
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson