Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Woman admits lying about rape claim - man served 8 years of life sentence, soon to be free
rdu.news14 ^

Posted on 05/07/2003 2:21:39 AM PDT by chance33_98

Woman admits lying about rape claim

5/6/2003 2:45 PM By: News 14 Carolina Staff

A Durham man will go free after serving eight years of a life sentence for sex crimes.

Che Fletcher, 30, was convicted in 1995 of raping a woman at gunpoint and shooting her.

Now the woman said she lied. She said she accused Fletcher of rape because he refused to pay her for sex and Fletcher said the shooting was an accident.

He should get out of jail later this week.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; US: North Carolina
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 05/07/2003 2:21:39 AM PDT by chance33_98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: chance33_98
Rape is a terrible crime. So is a false accusation of rape that destroys a man's reputation which he has to live with the rest of his life. It just makes prosecuting cases where women have been raped all that much harder. No one walks away looking good from this one.
2 posted on 05/07/2003 2:25:21 AM PDT by goldstategop ( In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
When any person is falsely accused / tried / convicted / sentenced and later the false accusation is discovered, the false accuser should be forced to serve the entire sentence. That would include life sentences and death penalties. Period!!!
3 posted on 05/07/2003 2:33:22 AM PDT by Highest Authority
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Highest Authority
When any person is falsely accused / tried / convicted / sentenced and later the false accusation is discovered, the false accuser should be forced to serve the entire sentence. That would include life sentences and death penalties.

Agreed. Another legal principle that King Hammurabi got right and modern "liberalism" gets wrong.

4 posted on 05/07/2003 2:38:12 AM PDT by John Locke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: chance33_98
When does The accuser start her 8 year sentence? She should have to for her lies, you know.
5 posted on 05/07/2003 2:38:43 AM PDT by wingnuts'nbolts (I see the world and my surroundings in a new light and I still hate all things Clinton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wingnuts'nbolts
Somehow, NOW will come into the picture and assure us she is still the victim, and make him finally pay her or something. We live in a sick twisted world sometimes.
6 posted on 05/07/2003 2:41:01 AM PDT by chance33_98 (www.hannahmore.com -- Shepherd Of Salisbury Plain is online, more to come! (my website))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: chance33_98
" She said she accused Fletcher of rape because he refused to pay her for sex and Fletcher said the shooting was an ACCIDENT"

Something stinks here!!!

7 posted on 05/07/2003 2:55:13 AM PDT by Dacus943
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dacus943
Most likely Fletcher was trying to rip a hooker off, as some johns are known to do. Most likely he never talked to the lawyers or cops about how there was a struggle for his gun he kept in his glover compartment, or the one she had in her purse.

Sometimes both people look so bad, nothing resembling the truth comes out because they won't utter it. Then again, that's the risk with charges like rape.
8 posted on 05/07/2003 2:58:36 AM PDT by Skywalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Dacus943
Something stinks here!!!

Bingo..

9 posted on 05/07/2003 3:02:24 AM PDT by LowOiL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
"No one walks away looking good from this one".

I'd say the innocent man has walked away looking good. And the feminist-leaning system of law that oppresses so many innocent men has walked away looking pretty bad. But I don't expect this to change one single thing about how these abuse allegations are handled. Two main rules apply in Divorce Courts and Sexual/physical abuse cases: 1. Woman = good 2. Man = no good.

10 posted on 05/07/2003 4:17:43 AM PDT by TheCrusader
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: John Locke
Put her in the same general copulation population he was in.
11 posted on 05/07/2003 4:18:49 AM PDT by ALS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: chance33_98
She said she accused Fletcher of rape because he refused to pay her for sex and Fletcher said the shooting was an accident.

Sounds like it was a rape in any event. If her consent was conditional on him paying and he didn't, that was nonconsensual sex (i.e. rape).

12 posted on 05/07/2003 4:19:30 AM PDT by ravinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Skywalk
"Sometimes both people look so bad, nothing resembling the truth comes out because they won't utter it."

So, in these cases put the male in jail? Something stinks about the way some "law enforcement" people think today. False testimony that puts a person in jail for a crime he did not commit should be severely punished. They knew this during the Spanish Inquisition, that it would prevent false accusations. If you lied to get an alleged "heretic" imprisoned, and it was found out, YOU served the time in jail that he would have served. It's time to put a similar law into practice, including into all abuse allegation cases. This will put a stop to the feminist agenda of oppressing men with false accusations in Courts of law.

13 posted on 05/07/2003 4:26:23 AM PDT by TheCrusader
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: John Locke
"Agreed. Another legal principle that King Hammurabi got right and modern "liberalism" gets wrong."

This is particularly true in the case of rape charges which were falsified.


14 posted on 05/07/2003 4:52:21 AM PDT by Spirited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Highest Authority
I agree. Furthermore, this greatly hurts prosecuting true rape cases.
15 posted on 05/07/2003 5:05:59 AM PDT by Dante3 (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: chance33_98
Come on! We all have known since Anita Hill testified before Congress against Clarence Thomas that women don't lie about these sorts of things.

EVERYBODY, BACK IN LINE!

16 posted on 05/07/2003 5:18:25 AM PDT by Black Bart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheCrusader
I agree. I'm just saying the actual real story doesn't come out in court. Probably both did something they could be in jail for, but the damn hooker didn't come forward for eight years. I don't know what happened, but the sordid circumstances of their encounter made it difficult for the truth to flow freely, I imagine.
17 posted on 05/07/2003 1:45:14 PM PDT by Skywalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: chance33_98
The woman should serve eight years at least, if not the man's life term sentence. Odd the article makes no mention of what the woman will get.
18 posted on 05/07/2003 2:44:34 PM PDT by gcruse (Vice is nice, but virtue can hurt you. --Bill Bennett)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chance33_98
true, sadly, true.
19 posted on 05/07/2003 7:31:08 PM PDT by wingnuts'nbolts (/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson