Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

China's Countryside Facing "Extremely Serious" SARS Epidemic
Agence France-Presse ^ | Wednesday, May 07, 2003 | Robert J. Saiget

Posted on 05/07/2003 10:24:59 AM PDT by Dog Gone

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-73 next last
To: blam
It's a given that some of those people left Beijing with the virus. We're in the period where they should be starting to get sick and spreading the disease in their hometowns.

I don't think we're likely to get any good information on the numbers or extent of the rural illness in the next few months. I don't the Chinese will even have the numbers to lie about if they wanted to.

21 posted on 05/07/2003 1:13:20 PM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: flamefront
...the new study - the first to be based on a statistically sound sample of 1,425 cases -puts the death rate at one in five (20%) of those admitted to hospital.

Not that SARS isn't serious, just wanted to add a little emphasis to the rest of the story...

Note, this bug is new, I doubt anyone would offer a guess as to how many people have been infected and not admitted to a hospital.

Unnecessary and sometimes even necessary panic often leads to poor decision making.

22 posted on 05/07/2003 2:50:35 PM PDT by !1776!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
major bump!
23 posted on 05/07/2003 2:58:00 PM PDT by jerseygirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
Here's the key sentence:
"The basic rural medical facilities are weak, technical capabilities are not adequate (and) the epidemic surveillance system is not sound."

Swap out "rural" and replace it with "Chinese" and the sentence is just as accurate and lets you know why this thing is running rampant in China and everybody else is getting their arms around it.
24 posted on 05/07/2003 3:01:01 PM PDT by discostu (A cow don't make ham)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: !1776!
"Note, this bug is new, I doubt anyone would offer a guess as to how many people have been infected and not admitted to a hospital. "

Or how many people are infected and have such mild symptoms they never even suspect.
25 posted on 05/07/2003 3:03:07 PM PDT by WoofDog123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: aristeides
I don't think they had a choice. Here's a map (not a good one, near as I can tell there are no good maps of Beijing) http://www.beijinghotelchina.com/travel/beijing_hotels.html
Hard to figure out how to close that all off. Remember they couldn't even manage to close of Tianimen Square. That's one of those things that's very easy to say needs to be done but very difficult to actually do.
26 posted on 05/07/2003 3:07:43 PM PDT by discostu (A cow don't make ham)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: WoofDog123
This story is intersting in several respects.

As a China watcher, I recall a story about 6 months ago that highlighted a coming social problem the Chinese Communists were struggling with. It seems they expected as many as 200 million people would leave the rural parts for the cities. And many then voiced concern that such a move could be a source of social unrest.

Now we still don't really know how the SARS virus developed. However, one should not rule out a "Red Hand" as a possible way this got started.

Tin Foil hat back in the drawer.

27 posted on 05/07/2003 3:11:37 PM PDT by CT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: All
SARS death rate to increase because of specialist shortage .
28 posted on 05/07/2003 3:19:16 PM PDT by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: All
Home quarantine for recovered SARS patients extended to 21 days .
29 posted on 05/07/2003 3:21:13 PM PDT by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: All
HOW NANJING OFFICIAL'S SELFISH ACT HURT OTHERS: 10,000 quarantined .
30 posted on 05/07/2003 3:24:24 PM PDT by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: discostu
It isn't under control in Taiwan, either, and they have better medical facilities. Unlike China, though, I expect they will get it under control. They're being as strict about it as Singapore is.
31 posted on 05/07/2003 3:41:40 PM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
I lost track of Taiwan in all the shuffle.
32 posted on 05/07/2003 3:44:39 PM PDT by discostu (A cow don't make ham)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
Breakout .... this is where it gets away from everyone.
33 posted on 05/07/2003 3:50:45 PM PDT by Centurion2000 (We are crushing our enemies, seeing him driven before us and hearing the lamentations of the liberal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: flamefront
I can believe that it is that deadly but how many deaths are there considering the total number of cases ?
34 posted on 05/07/2003 3:53:36 PM PDT by Centurion2000 (We are crushing our enemies, seeing him driven before us and hearing the lamentations of the liberal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
One would think that a disease with a low infection rate such as SARS would spread even more slowly in rural areas where the opportunity for infection is less than in highly populated areas and concentrations such as hospitals.
35 posted on 05/07/2003 3:54:00 PM PDT by RightWhale (Theorems link concepts; proofs establish links)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
"I don't think we're likely to get any good information on the numbers or extent of the rural illness in the next few months. I don't (think) the Chinese will even have the numbers to lie about if they wanted to."

One morning we'll wake up and everyone in China will be dead. ...And when we do, I want to go over there and dig into that big pyramid of the first emperor Chia. (I think was his name). They presently won't let anyone dig in it.

36 posted on 05/07/2003 3:56:11 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
I've never been to China, but I have the impression that rural does not mean lightly-populated. I think the fear is that there is no such thing as an isolation ward outside of the big eastern cities and one sick person in a village could infect far greater numbers than in the cities where quarantines are in effect.
37 posted on 05/07/2003 4:04:18 PM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
SARS has got FR spooked.

Not one person has suggested that the Chinese countryside is facing a "vey series" SARS epidemic :o)
38 posted on 05/07/2003 4:09:34 PM PDT by Poohbah (Crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentations of their women!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
If this thing spreads this fast outside China, it won't just be Series... it will be


39 posted on 05/07/2003 4:18:41 PM PDT by adam_az
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
There are communal houses in rural China, some fairly large. There, they live in close proximity to each other. There would be low levels of communication between villages, however: rural people tend to not travel a lot.
40 posted on 05/07/2003 4:24:54 PM PDT by RightWhale (Theorems link concepts; proofs establish links)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-73 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson