Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Toddsterpatriot
So, we burn some fuel, inefficiently, to create H2 and then burn the H2 to, inefficiently, move an automobile or to generate electricity? Sounds rather inefficient.

That wasn't what I suggested at all. Go back and read the post again. Energy sources are not fungible. Some are best suited for one application but totally wrong for others. A blind measure of efficiency even if technically accurate is meaningless economically.

67 posted on 05/07/2003 2:00:40 PM PDT by Ditto (You are free to form your own opinions, but not your own facts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]


To: Ditto
Fine, hydrogen fuel cells are great for space travel. For cars they would be stupid. How does this make my earlier points wrong? A hydrogen economy would include what? We are talking about energy usage on this planet, right?

And why is a hydrogen economy a good idea? To reduce CO2? Is CO2 a threat?

115 posted on 05/07/2003 9:27:14 PM PDT by Toddsterpatriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson