To: Satadru
Do you know what the criteria is for being zotted?1. Being a newbie posting liberal crapola.
2. Being a "sleeper" (registering, then staying inactive) and suddenly posting liberal crapola.
3. Posting pictures of gay men engaged in anal fisting. (I am NOT making that one up--someone actually did that.)
4. Being a newbie and posting racist crapola.
5. Being caught posting under a new ID after being banned.
89 posted on
05/07/2003 12:56:22 PM PDT by
Poohbah
(Crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentations of their women!)
To: Poohbah
6. Being a hit and run poster (especially a newbie) posting liberal BS
94 posted on
05/07/2003 12:58:41 PM PDT by
clamper1797
(Per caritate viduaribus orphanibusque sed prime viduaribus)
To: Poohbah; Satadru
Do you know what the criteria is for being zotted? 1. Being a newbie posting liberal crapola.
2. Being a "sleeper" (registering, then staying inactive) and suddenly posting liberal crapola. AKA the Ultra-Lurk Troll
95 posted on
05/07/2003 12:58:56 PM PDT by
jriemer
(We are a Republic not a Democracy)
To: Poohbah
5. Being caught posting under a new ID after being banned. How would you ever identify that?
Is it OK for a non-newbie to post liberal or racist crapola? Also, what is liberal, or racist? Most of posts showering praise to GW should be zotted for lack of content.
I agree with zotting anal fisting though.
106 posted on
05/07/2003 1:01:51 PM PDT by
Satadru
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson