[DED]

It seems to me that the Rochas are more entitled to say whether Laci and Conner should be "used in a politicized debate over abortion" than Susan Estrich.

And the idea Estrich promotes that Sharon Rocha didn't lose a grandson is preposterous, as is the feminists position that there is only one death when a pregnant woman is murdered.

The feminists are supprters of heinous crimes against humanity. It is not for lack of reason that they are called "feminazis".

[Lil'freeper]

Kate Michelman celebrates choice...

[Psalm 73]

Great article - K-Lo from NRO just ROCKS !!!

Please show up at your local abortion mill at baby-killing time and show the world that someone DOES care about these most innocent of victims - you're guaranteed to get a warm welcome and some hugs from the faithful prayer warriors on the sidewalk..........

[MEGoody]

"If this is murder, well, then any time a late-term fetus is aborted, they could call it murder,"

Yes, because it is.

[lurky]

"Conner Peterson . . . doesn't deserve, however, to be used to score points in a debate that should have nothing to do with this case. The least we can do to honor Laci and Conner Peterson's memories is to not use them as pawns in a politicized debate over abortion."

I like Estrich, but she's dead wrong about this. The murdered are frequently used as "pawns" to further larger agendas. One may disagree with the ethics or message of the practice, but advocacy groups have every right to do it. Perfect example of both sides of this coin: Matthew Shepard/Jesse Dirkhising.