[webstersII]

"The evolution of the horse from a species of small, forest dwelling omnivores to a species of large plans
dwelling herbivores is confirmed by the fossil record."

This idea was debunked several years ago due to dis-similar traits in the supposed progression of the animals. Not sure if the Chicago museum still has their exhibit on display, though.

[elbucko]

This idea was debunked several years ago due to dis-similar traits in the supposed progression of the animals..

It was my understanding that it was back in fashion, again. More equine fossils were found since the Chicago museum.

[donh]

This idea was debunked several years ago due to dis-similar traits in the supposed progression of the animals. Not sure if the Chicago museum still has their exhibit on display, though.

Hogwash. The eohippus-horse progression gets better established with each passing decade's new finds. You are no doubt reporting a minor early mis-apprehension in the ordering of the fossils--the sort of adjustment that is made all the time as new evidence comes in, and in more fields of science than just paleontology. Anyone with access to a natural history museum can verify that this progression has not been "debunked" except to the satisfaction of the "scientists" at the Creationist Institute.