Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: OOPisforLiberals
A more honest budget accounting was put in place during Reagan's terms. Does any one really believe that Carter had a 60 Billion deficit in 1980? Items accounted formerly as "off-budget" were under Reagan accounted for as "on-budget."

Reagan's Admin. brought alot of the smoke and mirrors of the phony Soc Sec "trust fund" to light as well.

I look forward to the day when the lie is put to the whole Soc Sec scam for all to see and appreciate. Just know the exposure therof first took place on Reagan's watch.

Last point: Tax cuts under Reagan more than doubled revenues. Blame the Congress for spending those revenues AND MORE which resulted in the reported deficits. Rememeber, the President can't "spend" anything, only Congress.

77 posted on 05/09/2003 8:25:05 AM PDT by Agamemnon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]


To: Agamemnon
The president "can't spendz?" Well, Bush ain't helping. He is turning out to be a bigger spender than Clinton but the the new GOP/Keynesian mantra seems to be that deficits are good.
83 posted on 05/09/2003 1:25:29 PM PDT by Austin Willard Wright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies ]

To: Agamemnon
This makes sense.

What about the argument of hugely increase military spending due to the Cold War arms race. It has been ages since I took an economics course, but I'm pretty sure I remember Reagan being blamed for the deficit specifically due to the arms race.
85 posted on 05/09/2003 4:24:22 PM PDT by OOPisforLiberals
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson