Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sorry, Stanley
The Wall Street Journal ^ | Friday, May 9, 2003

Posted on 05/09/2003 6:48:35 AM PDT by TroutStalker

Edited on 04/22/2004 11:48:52 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

Someone owes Stanley Works an apology. Last year, Connecticut politicians and the AFL-CIO shamed the tool and hardware company out of reincorporating in Bermuda so it could save $30 million in corporate income taxes. Attorney General Richard Blumenthal and GOP Congresswoman Nancy Johnson will no doubt now want to take some responsibility for the company's decision this week to lay off 1,000 workers and close nine facilities.


(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Editorial; Government; News/Current Events; US: Connecticut
KEYWORDS: jobmarket; layoffs; offshore; stanleyworks; taxes

1 posted on 05/09/2003 6:48:35 AM PDT by TroutStalker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TroutStalker
Someone owes Stanley Works an apology. Last year, Connecticut politicians and the AFL-CIO shamed the tool and hardware company out of reincorporating in Bermuda so it could save $30 million in corporate income taxes. Attorney General Richard Blumenthal and GOP Congresswoman Nancy Johnson will no doubt now want to take some responsibility for the company's decision this week to lay off 1,000 workers and close nine facilities.
Willlie Green, call your office!
2 posted on 05/09/2003 6:53:17 AM PDT by Asclepius (as above, so below)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TroutStalker
>>Mountains of economic evidence show that corporations don't pay taxes; they merely collect them, with the tax cost absorbed by customers, employees or shareholders

Stupid statement...by that logic, individuals don't pay taxes either, since for the most part they get their salaries from corporations. SO really, corporations pay all taxes right??
3 posted on 05/09/2003 6:54:10 AM PDT by freeper12 (Republican president, senate and house...where are the spending cuts??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freeper12
It's not a stupid statement at all.
4 posted on 05/09/2003 7:13:30 AM PDT by Mr. Bird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: freeper12
This statement is not stupid. Taking your logic to its obvious conclusion, instead of taxing individuals, the IRS should just levy the tax on the corporation for every employee. This is what social security taxes are. A levy on headcount. Corporate taxes on profits are like any of the other costs of doing business. They are figured into the sales of product or services.

The biggest check I ever wrote was for $700,000 to the IRS for the first quarter taxes when I first went into business. I struggled with the problem of why they took this much money off the top. I've never taken anything like this amount out of the business myself, and at the time I would and could have used it to buy equipment to create more business. What did they( the government ) do to lay claim to that much of the profit generated? I still don't have the answer to that question.

Since then we make sure the tax bill is as low as it can be. Who paid that first tax? The employees I would have hired did.
5 posted on 05/09/2003 7:18:04 AM PDT by JeanLM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: freeper12
That statement is 100% correct.
6 posted on 05/09/2003 7:19:30 AM PDT by IYAS9YAS (Go Fast, Turn Left!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: freeper12
by that logic, individuals don't pay taxes either, since for the most part they get their salaries from corporations. SO really, corporations pay all taxes right??

In a word, no. This would only be true if individuals can voluntarily increase their salaries to offset the cost of taxes. If you have a job like this, please let me know so I can apply there.
7 posted on 05/09/2003 7:22:43 AM PDT by babyface00
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: freeper12
You are incorrect.
8 posted on 05/09/2003 7:42:07 AM PDT by jammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: babyface00
>>This would only be true if individuals can voluntarily increase their salaries to offset the cost of taxes.

But corporations can't voluntarily increase prices whenever they want either...not if they need to compete.
9 posted on 05/09/2003 7:47:31 AM PDT by freeper12 (Republican president, senate and house...where are the spending cuts??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: TroutStalker
Back when the original list of companies incorporating overseas came out, I noticed that there were a significant proportion of those companies involved in manufacturing hand- and power-tools. Stanley and Cooper still come to mind.

Anyone who's watched the tools biz can tell you that Red China is killing these guys. Milwaukee Electric Tool just moved a number of assembly lines to Mexico, closing plants in Mississippi to do it. THEY HAD JUST BUILT THOSE PLANTS IN MISSISSIPPI within the last 10 years!!!

And it's not just the "cost of labor," by a long shot. Tax and regulatory costs, as well as "lawyer-proof" designs, are driving domestic-manufacturing costs through the roof.

But there are those who think that Gingrich's "Free Trade" legalization of prostitutes is still the greatest thing since sliced bread. Not even the fact that X42, a traitor and pervert, signed this legislation gives anyone pause for thought.

Soon enough, there'll be PLENTY of time available to 'pause for thought;' there'll be no jobs to keep people busy in the manufacturing sector.
10 posted on 05/09/2003 7:51:08 AM PDT by ninenot (H&K: Problem-Solver)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freeper12
That's an old Reagan line: Corporations don't pay taxes....people pay taxes. ALL the taxes. And he was right. Raise taxes on a corporation, what does it do? Raise prices, if it's going to continue making a profit.
11 posted on 05/09/2003 8:02:43 AM PDT by Glock22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: freeper12
But corporations can't voluntarily increase prices whenever they want either...not if they need to compete.

Just because there's a potential downside, doesn't mean they can't (and don't) do it. Plenty of businesses are insulated from competition, either by the markets they serve, the products they produce, or the perception of their product by consumers.

IMHO, its a lot different than the position an employee is relative to an employer.

Besides that, many people don't work for corporations - who is paying their taxes? There are very few corporations that don't have any employees, customers, or shareholders.
12 posted on 05/09/2003 8:13:12 AM PDT by babyface00
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson