Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

N.Y. Times: Ex-Reporter 'Committed Fraud'
AP | 5/11/03 | TARA BURGHART

Posted on 05/11/2003 3:27:17 AM PDT by kattracks

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

1 posted on 05/11/2003 3:27:17 AM PDT by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kattracks
The investigation showed that while he was filing stories with datelines from around the country, Blair was often in the New York City borough of Brooklyn, even filing expense receipts from stores and restaurants there.

This guy's crime was that he was using other people's material. If this guy had stuck to making up headlines and proving his points through creative writing, he would have been just fine. That's how the media does business. He wrote over 600 articles. The Times looked the other way for this guy until they just couldn't anymore.

2 posted on 05/11/2003 3:45:12 AM PDT by Excuse_My_Bellicosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
More than one Clymer...
3 posted on 05/11/2003 5:14:24 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Blair was part of a Diversity Journalism program.

I guess the color of ones skin is more important than whether they tell the truth or not.
4 posted on 05/11/2003 5:24:58 AM PDT by Guillermo (Sic 'Em!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
N.Y. Times: Ex-Liberal-Reporter 'Committed Fraud'
5 posted on 05/11/2003 5:30:50 AM PDT by DoctorMichael (...............ooooo-shu-be-do-wop.................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
I wish he had written about those black churches burning in Arkansas, that Clinton mentioned. - Tom
6 posted on 05/11/2003 5:46:27 AM PDT by Capt. Tom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
They've known this since 2002. The only reason it' s out in the open now is that another newspaper called them on it. Wonder if the Times tried to get that other paper to keep quiet? I haven't seen anyone ask that question yet...
7 posted on 05/11/2003 5:49:12 AM PDT by mewzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Rather odd that outsiders had to expose the "journalist". One has to wonder what else is locked in the NYT closet. "All the news fit to print", sure it is.
8 posted on 05/11/2003 5:52:23 AM PDT by cynicom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
If it had been a less liberal paper in the center of the controversy, Jesse Jackson and Johnnie Cochran would be on its doorstep howling in harmony about a "rush to judgment."
9 posted on 05/11/2003 5:53:44 AM PDT by Kevin Curry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
"The Times cited several reasons for not detecting the problems with Blair, including 'a failure of communication among senior editors; few complaints from the subjects of (Blair's) articles; his savviness and his ingenious ways of covering his tracks.'"

Couldn't be because he is a minority and diversity is everything, could it?
10 posted on 05/11/2003 6:44:56 AM PDT by ImpotentRage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
This is why I'm so skeptical of "unnamed sources." It's just too easy to make something up and attribute it to an unnamed source.
11 posted on 05/11/2003 7:08:51 AM PDT by alnick ("Never have so many been so wrong about so much." - Rummy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla
They've known this since 2002. The only reason it' s out in the open now is that another newspaper called them on it. Wonder if the Times tried to get that other paper to keep quiet? I haven't seen anyone ask that question yet...

Remember that the other paper not only "asked" the Times to investigate, but also leaked the data to Howard Kurtz as well, who published it. I believe it wasn't even 36 hours from initial complaint until Blair was shown the door "resigned."

12 posted on 05/11/2003 8:43:59 AM PDT by Timesink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Liberal journalism is all about distorting the facts or just making them up to fit their agenda. It's been going on for years; Pulitzers have even been awarded to work that was pure fantasy pawned off as fact.

In a way I don't blame this young reporter for doing what he did--he was just emulating what his peers taught him and taking it to the next level.
13 posted on 05/11/2003 8:46:03 AM PDT by randog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Ummmm... I think the News paper realizes the push from the right, and knows it is guilty of many of the same things Blair is. I think they wanted to put on a little show, and Blair was the fall guy...
14 posted on 05/11/2003 8:53:02 AM PDT by sit-rep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Times Watch
15 posted on 05/11/2003 9:05:22 AM PDT by Republican_Strategist (Win the War on Terrorism - Bomb Iraq!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
I'll remember this incident every time I hear one of the useful idiots rattling on about the Internet and "its lack of filters" and how sites like Drudge Report can't be trusted because of the lack thereof.
16 posted on 05/11/2003 10:20:06 AM PDT by dwollmann
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Guillermo
"I guess the color of ones skin is more important than whether they tell the truth or not."

Also more important than whether the guy has even graduated from a school of journalism. This guy failed to complete his course of studies and yet got a NYT internship and was then hired on as a reporter. This is a job most experienced journalists with degrees cannot get. The NYT promoted an inexperienced rank amateur over the heads of well-trained and seasoned professionals. They knew exactly what they were doing and yet went ahead anyway. The question is --

"Why ?"

It can't be the color of his skin only, because there are plenty of qualified black journalists out there.

17 posted on 05/11/2003 12:58:00 PM PDT by Bonaparte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: randog
"...he was just emulating what his peers taught him and taking it to the next level."

He made the mistake of getting caught. He wasn't taught to do that. In fact, he had plenty of examples before him of what happens when even experienced reporters get caught -- at the Boston Globe, at The New Republic, etc.

18 posted on 05/11/2003 1:03:26 PM PDT by Bonaparte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
The Times has a long history of lying. I'm surprised this guy wasn't promoted.

Wonder if Arthur and Howell will blame this on the vast, right wing controlled, media cabal.

19 posted on 05/11/2003 1:50:38 PM PDT by mcenedo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: alnick
People don't even listen to named sources and photos regarding the Ron Brown crash. They called it 'an urban myth' in Snopes, even though four forensic specialists in the Military stuck to their guns as they were drummed out of the military and one, Kathleen Janowski was even threatened with execution by the military brass. Ah but that can't be so because, well because...er... it can't be so.
20 posted on 05/13/2003 3:09:11 AM PDT by Arthur Wildfire! March (LIBERTY or DEATH!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson