Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sci Fi Guy
1st Seymour Hersh in the New Yorker and now here in the Boston Globe are explications of Strauss aimed to hit at the present Administration.

This treatment is marginally more balanced (very marginally).

When will we see equal time given to Antonio Gramsci? I have yet to meet a committed Progressive who admits to ever hearing the name Gramsci.
4 posted on 05/11/2003 7:11:20 AM PDT by reformedliberal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: reformedliberal
You'll notice that they never address anything Strauss has written. Everything centers around what other people think or have said about Strauss; everything focuses on motives. The implication seems to be that motives account for everything.

Strauss wouldn't have agreed with this approach. He actually believed in truth.

9 posted on 05/11/2003 7:46:02 AM PDT by Reactionary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: reformedliberal
When will we see equal time given to Antonio Gramsci? I have yet to meet a committed Progressive who admits to ever hearing the name Gramsci.

Imagine the same investigative journalism taking a look at the progressives...Hell, imagine this kind of investigative journalism from a mainstream source just once focusing on the Clinton administration...

33 posted on 05/11/2003 10:14:10 AM PDT by stands2reason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson