Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What Price Motherhood? Moms rally to demand Social Security for work as caregivers
The Sunday Star-Ledger (NJ) ^ | 5/11/03 | Peggy O'Crowley

Posted on 05/11/2003 10:20:02 AM PDT by VeritatisSplendor

Edited on 07/06/2004 6:38:49 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

Families honor their mothers today with perfume, hanging plants, and dinners out. What many of today's mothers want most, however, doesn't come from a store. They want respect, financial recognition, and nothing less than to change the way society looks at motherhood. And they're not waiting for anyone to give it to them.


(Excerpt) Read more at nj.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Extended News; Government
KEYWORDS: congress; motherhood; socialsecurity; welfare
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 next last
To: zip
I hit post too quickly.

SSI, Food Stamps, state aid, etc. There are welfare programs available in every state but Social Security shouldn't be the answer for doles. It was established for working people paiying their share into the fund and receiving funds, when justifed, from SS. Nowhere in the Act does it say "give away for getting pregnant" or "give away for taking care of someone's child". Maybe I have an edited edition of the law?

41 posted on 05/11/2003 1:56:25 PM PDT by zip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: zip
"SSI??"

You can only get SSI if you have less than $2000 in assets. She has 1/2 the house and half the X's 401K (which she can't spend yet).

As soon as her net worth drops below $2000, yes she can get SSI.
42 posted on 05/11/2003 1:58:51 PM PDT by babygene (Viable after 87 trimesters)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: VeritatisSplendor
Might as well give it American moms --- President Fox of Mexico is demanding social security benefits be given to his citizens. Just give it to everyone who never put in ---the program needs to be ended.
43 posted on 05/11/2003 2:01:41 PM PDT by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: babygene; All
I am not saying she should not receive assistance, but I am saying NOT FROM SOCIAL SECURITY ADMIN sources. It WAS NOT designed to be a welfare program. Don't attache more give-aways to a private, non government, funded operation.
44 posted on 05/11/2003 2:02:59 PM PDT by zip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Pan_Yans Wife
"But, if I am working, for my husband, wouldn't we then be subjected to higher taxes, as a two income family?"

Probably not, because wayges he pays are deductible as a business expense. He gets the duduction, and you get the wayges. I think it would ballance out so that you paid just the SS taxes.
45 posted on 05/11/2003 2:04:36 PM PDT by babygene (Viable after 87 trimesters)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: SarahW
Sarah, you are right. I stayed home for 16 years taking care of an ill husband and two learning disabled children. I was in a car accident a few years ago, which severely injured me and from which I am still disabled. My husband died suddenly, and I as I am not invested in SS I cannot get disability. I have been praying and trying to find a way to support myself. At 16 and 18 the boys are trying to help out but are really too young.

I would gladly have paid SS taxes of some kind in the past few years in order to have qualified. I always thought I would be able to get a job when he passed on, but I never reckoned on the car accident.
46 posted on 05/11/2003 2:10:28 PM PDT by I still care (America is great because it is good. When it ceases to be good, it will cease to be great.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: zip
SOCIAL SECURITY leads to.... SOCIALISM
47 posted on 05/11/2003 2:10:29 PM PDT by Elsie (Don't believe every prophecy you read - ESPECIALLY *** ones)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: zip; All
I'm not suggesting that mom's get SS without paying in. They just need to find a way to pay in...


48 posted on 05/11/2003 2:13:25 PM PDT by babygene (Viable after 87 trimesters)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: I still care
I would gladly have paid SS taxes of some kind in the past few years in order to have qualified.............
Honey, there were GOBS of offers of LIFE INSURANCE delivered to your mail box every year!!!!

You HAD a chance, why did you not TAKE it?

Do you want it to be MANDATORY??? Government IMPOSED on ALL people???

Are you AWARE of the NAME of that FORM of Gov't???

49 posted on 05/11/2003 2:13:28 PM PDT by Elsie (Don't believe every prophecy you read - ESPECIALLY *** ones)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: I still care
At 16 and 18 the boys are trying to help out but are really too young.

If they are in the home then you have to go back to SSA Office and they will arrange for support of the boys. They will also refer you to social assistance agencies.

50 posted on 05/11/2003 2:17:06 PM PDT by zip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Elsie
He couldn't get life insurance because of his illness. We have some left over from the early 80's, from before he became ill, but were never able to increase it to meet our needs. Once they find out he was on oxygen, he couldn't qualify.

51 posted on 05/11/2003 2:18:52 PM PDT by I still care (America is great because it is good. When it ceases to be good, it will cease to be great.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: zip; I still care
"If they are in the home then you have to go back to SSA Office and they will arrange for support of the boys."

There are only survivor benifits in this case if the husband was qualified. If the husband hadn't paid in for enough quarters, then there would be no benifit for the boys or the wife.
52 posted on 05/11/2003 2:33:05 PM PDT by babygene (Viable after 87 trimesters)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: babygene
If the husband hadn't paid in for enough quarters, then there would be no benifit for the boys or the wife.

Didn't realize that issue. thx

53 posted on 05/11/2003 2:38:31 PM PDT by zip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: zip

We (I) never THOUGHT this would happen to us (me)....


Ain't this the truth......
We either, as INDIVIDUALS, have to START thinking this way or else

WE, as MEMEBRS of the COLLECTIVE, will have the Gov't to do it 'for' us.


If there is ANY other way, I do not know of it.
54 posted on 05/11/2003 2:57:58 PM PDT by Elsie (Don't believe every prophecy you read - ESPECIALLY *** ones)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: zip
Right now, the employer pays you a dollar and pays the feds 7 cents for a total cost of 1.07 to the employer, and you pay 7 cents and you get 93 cents left. Would you feel better if the employer paid the entire tax where the employer would pay you 93 cents and pay 14 cents to the fed for a total of 1.07 cost to the employer. Would you feel badly if the employer no tax and you had to pay it all ? Here the employer would pay you 1.07 and pay no tax, while you would get 1.07 but would pay 14 cents in tax for a take home pay of 93 cents.

Basically, the employer thinks your work is worth 1.07 but you get only 93 cents. I'd say that no matter who is writing the check, the employee is paying the tax.
55 posted on 05/11/2003 4:53:04 PM PDT by staytrue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: zip
Unless you consider people like me workers.
56 posted on 05/11/2003 6:02:43 PM PDT by SarahW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: SarahW
It is taking money from workers and redistributing it to non workers.

Maybe I should have stated it "...from SS TAX paying workers and redistributing it (out of ss funds) to Non SS TAX paying workers and non workers. OKAY?

57 posted on 05/11/2003 6:22:41 PM PDT by zip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: *Social Security
http://www.freerepublic.com/perl/bump-list
58 posted on 05/11/2003 7:26:12 PM PDT by Libertarianize the GOP (Ideas have consequences)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: zip
And yet, I'm entitled to a portion of my spouses retirement benefits (as well as my own). My entitlement to my husbands benefits takes into account the contribution I make.

Not to mention, I was once qualified for disability benefits. But it "expires" - the number of credits required goes up as you age, and you have to earn a certain number of them within a specified period before your disability.

Women who leave the workforce to care for family lose the right to claim disability benefits after a fairly short time. And no matter how many credits you have (and I have a lot) you have earn to at least 20 of the credits in the 10 years immediately before you became disabled (if you are 31 or over, which most women with a 12 yo are) Im 40.

It would take over two years for me to be eligible for SS disability again.

Mothers who sacrifice their earning years are totally out of luck if the spouse dies, she goes to work, and becomes injured or ill before those twenty credits are accrued.
women should

59 posted on 05/11/2003 7:54:24 PM PDT by SarahW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: staytrue
Now don't start showing the math. If mere humans discover that businesses do NOT pay any taxes, then the game will be over!
Businesses COLLECT taxes for the GOVERNMENT!!!!
60 posted on 05/11/2003 8:30:01 PM PDT by Elsie (Don't believe every prophecy you read - ESPECIALLY *** ones)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson