Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TrebleRebel; Badabing Badaboom; Mitchell; bonfire; birdwoman; Fred Mertz; riri; oceanview; ...
What we are talking about here is establishing deniability. We saw this with the faux "decapitation strikes" on Saddam Hussein during the recent dust-up in Iraq. The purpose of releasing this glove box story now is to plant the notion that we "have our man" -- and it's not Saddam Hussein. That probably means that we are going to be learning about the fate of Saddam Hussein in the not-too-distant future, and it's going to look awfully like he made a deal with somebody -- perhaps the same person who brokered our deal with Aziz. The purpose of the deniability is to provide an excuse for the fact that we haven't arrested our man, and aren't going to arrest our man, or even empanel a grand jury assembled from randomly-selected members of the public, any time soon.

If you have been following this case, then you know that the discovery of a makeshift glove box, anthrax spores and vials "wrapped in plastic" in a pond in a search ostensibly inspired by a scene in Hatfill's unpublished bioterrorism novel is incredibly incriminating. If taken at face value, I'd say, skip the trial -- let's go straight to the execution. This great discovery is supposed to have happened four months ago. And yet, no charges, no grand jury. What does that suggest to you about the veracity of this story? I suggest that it's all about as veracious as the story that a CIA operative "earprinted" Saddam Hussein entering a bunker on March 20, and spied him being med-evaced from the scene with an oxygen mask over his face after the US rained forty cruise missiles down on the bunker a few hours later. In other words, it's a complete fabrication -- window dressing to avoid the impression that Saddam Hussein whacked the United States and got off with his life by virtue of his threat to use WMD on the American public.

The FBI has been criticized by some conservative commentators for seeming to ignore the possibility that foreign terrorists or Iraq might have been responsible for the anthrax mailings. Some suggested the case might be solved by the discovery of biological weapons facilities in Iraq, but little evidence of recent Iraqi bioweapons activity has turned up.

The purpose of Amerithrax is to convince us that the origin of those anthrax threats has been a big mystery to the United States. In fact, it never was a mystery. At the highest level, we always understood perfectly well that those threats came from the state which attacked us using terrorist proxies on September 11, 2001. See Woodward, Bush at War, p. 248, for the real story.

17 posted on 05/12/2003 6:37:19 AM PDT by The Great Satan (Revenge, Terror and Extortion: A Guide for the Perplexed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: The Great Satan
I thought we weren't going to attack Iraq at all.

Get your story straight, will ya?
52 posted on 05/12/2003 12:53:24 PM PDT by Poohbah (Crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentations of their women!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson