tin foil hat for this guy
1 posted on
05/13/2003 7:17:43 AM PDT by
evets
To: evets
how about a tinfoil gag???
may take several rolls, but consider the righteousness of the cause....
2 posted on
05/13/2003 7:21:30 AM PDT by
philomath
(from the state of franklin)
To: evets
How about some Jenny Craig and Weight Watchers, too?
3 posted on
05/13/2003 7:21:31 AM PDT by
xrp
To: evets
Since when does Free Republic itself "note" something? And the term "unacceptable" is hardly clever enough to be in the FReeper lexicon.
To: evets
"whoever they are"...typical of the idiots at Miramax...if they don't know they should...of course they know fat boy anti-American Bush hater Mickey Moore or less...who received an Emmy for a documentary that was fiction. Ol' Walt would roll over in his grave if he knew what a cesspool his company had turned into. Or would he? Knowing that it finally realized it's potential for being a Mickey Mouse operation.
5 posted on
05/13/2003 7:26:25 AM PDT by
kellynla
("C" 1/5 1st Mar Div Viet Nam '69 & '70 Semper Fi)
To: evets
I wonder if they're also aware that we refer to MSNBC as PMSNBC?
6 posted on
05/13/2003 7:29:10 AM PDT by
Jaxter
(Proud Republican voter since 1972.)
To: evets
What I'd like to see is someone do their own "documentary" on Michael Moore......
7 posted on
05/13/2003 7:30:12 AM PDT by
isthisnickcool
(All items with this tag have been marked down. 20% off ! Today only!)
To: evets
FR doesn't actually have opinions on anything, although I've heard that some of its members do...
To: evets
How about a CLEAN hat?
To: evets
12 posted on
05/13/2003 7:37:45 AM PDT by
Diogenesis
(If you mess with one of us, you mess with all of us.)
To: evets
I was watching the Director's Commentary on the Back to the Future DVD. They were talking about who they shopped the movie to before it was finally made. They said Disney turned them down because of the scene where Lea Thompson's character kisses Michael J. Fox's character back in 1955.... because they didn't want to be associated with a movie that showed a mother romantically kissing her son.
But now, Disney is willing to produce this... what a crazy world we live in, huh?
14 posted on
05/13/2003 7:40:43 AM PDT by
mwyounce
To: evets
I"m pretty sure Moore will put so many LIES in his Crapumentary that HW BUSH should be able to sue him and Miramax into the ground for slander and libel.
17 posted on
05/13/2003 7:50:56 AM PDT by
Mister Baredog
((They wanted to kill 50,000 of us on 9/11, we will never forget!))
To: evets
Well, like the Dixie Chicks, Disney won't need to worry about getting any more business from me. I haven't liked the company since Walt died anyway.
To: evets
You've been scooped.
Moore
To: evets
Financing Michael Moores 2004 Attack Film on Bush is UNACCEPTABLE, notes the conservative Web site Free Republic, which gives contact numbers for people to complain to both Miramax and Disney.I wonder if MSNBC has hired that disgraced NYT's writer for its news staff. This has the earmarks of his style....
20 posted on
05/13/2003 7:59:08 AM PDT by
freebilly
(I think they've misunderestimated us....)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson