To: Hank Rearden
74 posted on
05/13/2003 9:10:43 AM PDT by
Timesink
To: Timesink
Additionally, the idea to stop counterfeiters was that familiarity, while also breeding contempt, would act as a way to fight counterfeits, since presumably, people would be able to spot something fishy on a bill. And like you said, overseas it helps because people feel comfortable about a US bill knowing that this is what it has and always looks like.
In the past, we did change our currency designs in some cases, every 5 years, depending on the bill. And we did have various designs with various colors, mostly greens, some reds, even some gold and orange and blue and brown. Of course, the neons you showed in your post just didn't exist then. But the overall idea is the same.
Of course in today's world of high-resolution scanners and printers, familiarity doesn't help anymore, since counterfeiters can make excellent fascimiles. So we have to swing back to the other side of the spectrum with lots of different colors thrown in and new pieces of design that have a security purpose as well. The negative consequence of this is that it can confuse and make people in other countries wary, but I think we're countering that by not making the design changes drastic. Just adding subtle color and some extra watermarks and stuff.
78 posted on
05/13/2003 9:27:24 AM PDT by
Conservative til I die
(They say anti-Catholicism is the thinking man's anti-Semitism; that's an insult to thinking men)
To: Timesink
I like the 10 and the 100. You forgot the purple 5 btw.
93 posted on
05/13/2003 10:03:51 AM PDT by
xp38
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson