To: cardinal4
Never thought about that. Isn't it on file at the university? If so, it'd be risky for her to try to doctor it up now; somebody there knows what was in it originally.
To: LibWhacker
Never thought about that. Isn't it on file at the university? If so, it'd be risky for her to try to doctor it up now; somebody there knows what was in it originally.Don't count on that, they love Hillary there, and would cover for her in a second!
To: LibWhacker
Never thought about that. Isn't it on file at the university? If so, it'd be risky for her to try to doctor it up now; somebody there knows what was in it originally.Isnt the thesis supposed to have some serious socialist overtones? If so, why release it now, when Patriotism is at an all time high? No. Hillary belongs to the party that went along with airbrushing algores picture on the Rolling Stone, to "Enhance" his manhood. Rewriting a manifesto would be nothing, an intern out of Berkely or Hawvawd could do it..
31 posted on
05/15/2003 5:18:16 PM PDT by
cardinal4
(The Senate Armed Services Comm; the Chinese pipeline into US secrets)
To: LibWhacker
She has placed a "no relase" order on it using the pretext of copyright because the unreleased part is a wholesale plagerized cut-and-paste job. If it was released in full, Wellesley would have to revoke her degree. She obviously doesn't want that to become public.
98 posted on
05/15/2003 5:49:59 PM PDT by
FreedomCalls
(It's the "Statue of Liberty" not the "Statue of Security.")
To: LibWhacker
". . .somebody there knows what was in it originally." Nobody that's still alive or wants to stay that way.
155 posted on
05/15/2003 9:38:24 PM PDT by
Badray
(Molon Labe!)
To: LibWhacker
Yeah, and if anyone dared come out and tell about what was REALLY in it, they could count on committing "suicide", Clinton style. I'd be shocked if the people who really knew what was in it are alive at this point.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson