Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Microsoft Offers Peek Into Newest Windows
Yahoo! News Technology ^ | 5/18/03 | Reed Stevenson - Reuters

Posted on 05/18/2003 4:28:09 PM PDT by NormsRevenge

SEATTLE (Reuters) -

Upgraded to Windows XP (news - web sites) yet? If not, you might miss your chance, because Microsoft Corp. (Nasdaq:MSFT - news)is already working on the newest version of its operating system, code-named Longhorn, due for release in 2005.

Although Windows XP, the most current version of Windows, is just 20 months old, the world's largest software maker is betting that users will be ready to upgrade within the next couple of years as personal computers become more powerful, faster and affordable.

Details about the new operating system remain scant, but Microsoft has already started soliciting feedback from hardware makers and software developers on key features of Longhorn, such as its graphics and security capabilities.

The challenge for Microsoft is to ensure that Windows, the software that runs on nearly all of the world's personal computers, will show enough of an improvement to convince users to upgrade, while fending off growing competition from Linux (news - web sites), the free operating system.

Although Microsoft previewed some of Longhorn's features at a hardware engineering conference last week, the software giant is holding its cards close to the chest.

"Microsoft is pleased with the progress to date on the development of the next version of Windows, code-named Longhorn," said Greg Sullivan, lead product manager for Windows, but added that "it's important to realize the product is still under development and evolving each day. As a result, it's too early to talk about specifics for the final version."

Still, technophiles eager to get their hands on this nascent version of Windows have already circulated "alpha," or early working versions, on the Internet and are buzzing over some of Longhorn's newest features.

NEW PLUMBING

Much of Longhorn's most significant improvements will be in its basic design and inner workings.

Microsoft is also developing a new security technology, code-named Palladium, which is widely expected to be a part of Longhorn.

Palladium will allow Microsoft to secure information passing through software and, more significantly, hardware.

For example, Microsoft could encrypt keyboard strokes passing through the cable connecting the keyboard and the PC, making it difficult to find out a secret password or eavesdrop on sensitive information.

Since Palladium also makes it easier for Microsoft to track users and locate illegal copies of its software, some consumer groups and Microsoft's competitors have voiced alarm over giving the Redmond, Washington-based software maker too much control.

A new file system allowing the operating system to store data more efficiently will also be a core part of Longhorn's design, Microsoft has said.

That system, based on database technology, is aimed at facilitating storage of different types of files, which are automatically categorized, and also making it easier to manage files without using folders.

The new file system will also make it easier to store and retrieve data in different locations, such as on a server or another computer in a different location.

NEW LOOK

The most dramatic change for most users, however, will be in the design of the Windows desktop.

Recent demonstrations by Microsoft hint the software maker is aiming to make Windows behave more like, well, Windows.

The individual windows in Longhorn will be semi-translucent, making it possible to discern the contents of one window hidden behind another.

The trick is in the degree of opacity -- completely transparent windows atop one another would turn information into a jumble of letters and graphics, while more opaque ones might defeat their own purpose.

The operating system's windows would ripple when moved and shrink or expand their content automatically, effects that require a significant amount of graphics power, the kind usually reserved for high-action 3D games.

What this means is that the new software will most likely require new hardware or upgrades to work well. PC Makers welcome the opportunity to make new sales, but users are becoming increasingly reluctant to buy new hardware to go along with software every few years.

"Longhorn sort of continues Microsoft's insistence and belief that the desktop personal computer is best served by a fully high-powered device," said Dwight Davis, a strategist at Summit Strategies.




TOPICS: Business/Economy; Extended News; News/Current Events; US: California; US: Washington
KEYWORDS: computersecurityin; microsoft; techindex
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-122 next last
To: Gforce11
just in case you need more information:

http://www.pcworld.com/news/article/0,aid,16021,00.asp
61 posted on 05/18/2003 5:28:57 PM PDT by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: reg45
The main improvement is that Longhorn will be a 64bit OS rather than a 32bit OS.

Will it be true 64-bit, or will it really just be 32-bit with the ability to use 64-bith memory adresses. It's going to be important really soon to have 64-bit memory adressing. The 4 GB memory limit of 32-bit processors is about to reached. I know a friend of mine who runs technical applications on a Dell laptop with 2 GB of memory.

62 posted on 05/18/2003 5:29:20 PM PDT by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
I don't know what's to complain about. Every new operating system since Windows 2.0 has been an improvement over its predecessor, with the sole exception of WinME. Win98 was better than Win95. Win98SE was a further improvement. Win 2000 was terrific. And I find WinXP slightly preferable to Win 2000. The same has been true of Internet Explorer upgrades.
63 posted on 05/18/2003 5:30:13 PM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Petronski
I love the graphic, but now I feel compelled to ask: was that picture composed on a Linux machine?

I dunno...

The Gimp could have made it on the *nix plat. Then again, I'm not into graphix, so don't get me to lying.


Doing bad things to bad people...

64 posted on 05/18/2003 5:31:32 PM PDT by rdb3 (Nerve-racking since 0413hrs on XII-XXII-MCMLXXI)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: oceanview
So everytime a court says something is right or wrong..then it must be so. Ok I think I will go back to sleep now. I have been enlightened. The fact that the court's judges had such an anti Microsoft bias had nothing to do with it.

The most BS term I have ever heard is "anticompetitive" behavior. If Microsoft payed the US Government (federal, state, or local) then I'd be all for the lawsuits. The fact that they didn't, the became number one on their own, and and..the more important part is that the consumer and businesses still had a choice of using MAC and Linux leads me to believe that the lawsuit was BS.
65 posted on 05/18/2003 5:31:59 PM PDT by Gforce11
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Gforce11
do you work for MSFT? or are you just a normal person in denial.
66 posted on 05/18/2003 5:33:30 PM PDT by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: rdb3
DHCP is a good protocol.
67 posted on 05/18/2003 5:34:36 PM PDT by gitmo ("The course of this conflict is not known, yet its outcome is certain." GWB)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: oceanview
LOL, no I don't work for MSFT or never have. But lets see...did Microsoft force businesses and consumers into buying something you didn't want to buy? The answer is NO!!!. So to me there was always a choice...just because MS didn't behave like you think they should've doesn't make them anti competitive.

Thomas Pennfield Jackson was reprimanded for his stupid remarks "off the field" so to speak about his anti Microsoft behavior, I hope you know that.

68 posted on 05/18/2003 5:36:48 PM PDT by Gforce11
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
I'm curious how you have your hardware setup so that win2000 runs faster than XP does. I have a P4 512 ram and a GF-ti4200 vid card with about 220 gigs in HD space and win2k runs great on my machine but not nearly as fast as XP Home or Pro does. My machine is primarily used as a DAW but I do some gaming and movie watching as well as basic surfing.

Again, just curious.
69 posted on 05/18/2003 5:38:08 PM PDT by TheStickman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative
My NT machine regular is up 4-6 weeks without needing a reboot. It is my domain controller and serves a webpage. Windows 2000 does rock though. However, my FreeBSD machine has held up for 100 days straight without needing a reboot and the reason it went down was because of a power outage. :(
70 posted on 05/18/2003 5:38:23 PM PDT by xrp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
Win 2000 is faster and leaner then XP. But XP has one thing I really like. Cleartype fonts that work great for LCD monitors. So much sharper.

Yes. One thing I do have complaints about Windows 2K is how difficult it is to use high resolution monitors. Sure Windows 2K will run a 1600 x 1200, but it can be difficult to read full some of the text in dialog boxes and messages from the operating system even on a 21-inch monitor. The size of menus and text is not really indepedent of the screen resolution. Windows XP seems to have the ability to scale them up without having to change "themes".

71 posted on 05/18/2003 5:40:06 PM PDT by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: xrp
at work, our Sun servers are rebooted perhaps twice per year, and that's just as a precaution!
72 posted on 05/18/2003 5:41:40 PM PDT by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Timesink
Hah...Linux hit in 1991 or so...Linux still remains a geek OS. Although, Red Hat is really doing well with their flavour of Linux. I run 8.0 and that's pretty sweet. I haven't tried Red Hat 9.0 yet. I've noticed that even when running with few services, Linux is becoming more and more a resource hog like Windows. I currently run RH 8.0 on a P2/400/256Mb RAM and sometimes it is sluggish. I can't imagine what RH 9.0 would be like. I run one of the latest versions of FreeBSD on a 486DX/80 with 64Mb RAM and it screeeeeeeeeeeeeeams, except when compiling :)
73 posted on 05/18/2003 5:46:42 PM PDT by xrp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
Internet Explorer STILL doesn't offer an option to TURN OFF popup windows, something Mozilla and Opera web browsers both offer.
74 posted on 05/18/2003 5:49:39 PM PDT by xrp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: xrp
My NT machine regular is up 4-6 weeks without needing a reboot. It is my domain controller and serves a webpage. Windows 2000 does rock though. However, my FreeBSD machine has held up for 100 days straight without needing a reboot and the reason it went down was because of a power outage. :(

If I took out all the hardware upgrades in that machine and went back to the factory configuration, it probably would work a couple of months without reboots. The problem was that after all the upgrades in memory, processors, graphics cards, hard disks, CD-RW writers, etc. it got less reliable. The whole menagerie of hardware started performing as if it had been preloaded at a factory with Windows 2000 when I upgraded the machine.

75 posted on 05/18/2003 5:50:42 PM PDT by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative
Oh, I see. I just run NT Server on my P166/64Mb RAM, it's rock solid stable and does the job that I need it to do in my LAN err house.
76 posted on 05/18/2003 5:51:58 PM PDT by xrp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: Timesink
"Market for cutting edge PCs that cost >$3K just so their owners can shoot their weapons in Quake XXXIV 3/1000ths of a second faster than their opponents: small."

Maybe if you go and by the latest and greatest Dell, you will spend 3k. If you go to a local computer store and have them build you a mid range computer for gaming, you will pay less than 1k and have a very decent gaming PC. Remember, you don't have to go out and buy a monitor, speakers, printer, mouse, keyboard, USB devices every time you want to get a new PC. You could build it yourself and save even more money than from a local computer store. I used to do this. These days , I would rather pay a few extra bucks to have someone else build me a PC with the parts that I want.

77 posted on 05/18/2003 5:54:56 PM PDT by Crispy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: babaloo999
"Why yes, it was an IBM drive."

So what. I have had a Western Digital and a Maxtor hard drive crashes. All hardrives have the potential to have a head crash or other failure.

78 posted on 05/18/2003 5:56:48 PM PDT by Crispy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: rdb3
Where did you get that pic? Is there a 1280x1024 and/or 800x600 version?
79 posted on 05/18/2003 5:58:03 PM PDT by Crispy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: xrp
I might add that I have never had so few problems upgrading an operating system when going from Windows NT to Windows 2000. Every other "upgrade" I tried with other operating systems seemed to create more problems than it solved.
80 posted on 05/18/2003 6:01:35 PM PDT by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-122 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson