Why should the RNC have responded to the flap over Santorum’s remarks? It was a tempest in a teapot driven by the gay agenda crowd and their allies in the mainstream media. It was so silly it didn’t merit comment, and disappeared off the radar screen quickly.
I think Bauer et. al. need to grow up. Threatening to tell “their people” to stay home on Election Day is the ultimate in cutting off your nose to spite your face. Do they really want a President Dean, Lieberman, or Kerry? OTOH, maybe they do want that. It will certainly increase donations to their organizations.
Why should the RNC have responded to the flap over Santorum’s remarks? It was a tempest in a teapot driven by the gay agenda crowd and their allies in the mainstream media. It was so silly it didn’t merit comment, and disappeared off the radar screen quickly.Uh, I guess you didn't notice the stories posted today about protests at Santorum's commencement speech. The homosexual media are not going to give up attacking Santorum until his supporters show some courage. And calling Santorum "inclusive" is not exactly courage.
I also wonder about your strategy of ignoring attacks on prominent defenders of family values. "Oh, it's not worth responding to," sounds to me like a prescription for disaster, in this area and in others.
I think Bauer et. al. need to grow up.
Now this is a horse of a different color. First you say the attacks on Santorum were not worth responding to. Now you say that social conservatives should grow up. Put the two together and it sounds like a program for liberal victory.