[RAT Patrol]

Tolerance is different from approval, but it is also different from stigmatizing and shunning those with whom we disagree.

Really? Tell that to the gaystapo. There should be a stigma placed on certain behaviors. I am sure Horowitz would agree with that. The only difference between Horowitz and Bauer is which behaviors they stigmatize.

Horowitz shouldn't use Scripture he doesn't believe in to make a point against people who do believe in those Scriptures. That's not very tolerant or sensitive.

[justshutupandtakeit]

Horowitz is right on the money to attack Bauer and the nutballs. What could he be thinking? Is absolutely right.

[Blood of Tyrants]

Horowitz shouldn't use Scripture he doesn't believe in to make a point against people who do believe in those Scriptures. That's not very tolerant or sensitive.

No, but it is a favorite tactic of those who seek to attack Christians.

[AnalogReigns]

When a non-Christian (or even a liberal so-called Christian) tries to make a point that "Jesus didn't say anything about homosexuality so...." I know they are speaking from ignorance about Christianity and the Bible.

Christianity always saw itself as the rightful heir to the Old Testament; the continuence of God's people--yet in a New Covenent.

Jesus isn't recorded to have spoken of a lot of moral behaviours the Old Testament condemns.... like child abuse or sacrifice for example, that doesn't mean such is fine and dandy. Jesus also clearly taught He was not sent to do away with the Old Testament laws, rather to fulfil them.

Both Old and New Testaments very clearly condemn homosexual behavior...the Old Testament calling it an "abomination" (same term applied to child sacrifice, by the way) the New Testament--through the Apostle Paul in the book of Romans, calling it evidence that God has "given over" societies to their own corruptions--and hence need Jesus as Savior.

It's not surprising to me that a society such as ours which has largely embraced abortion on demand (the modern form child sacrifice to Molech) is fast moving toward the acceptance of homosexual devience as "normal" too. Quite sad Horowitz can't see that.

How someone as well tuned as Horowitz is to the corruptions of the Left can't see the clear agenda of homosexual lobby groups--to tell people its normal behavior, and that people who disapprove on moral/religious grounds are "biggots," on par with the KKK.... I just don't understand.

Perhaps he's undergoing burnout....as even the right in Washington has its inconsistancies and troubles.

Politicians are politicians, whatever their stripe....

[Way2Serious]

"Horowitz shouldn't use Scripture he doesn't believe in to make a point against people who do believe in those Scriptures. That's not very tolerant or sensitive." Nor smart. He's obviously ignorant of St. Paul's position on the matter of homosexuality.