[Aric2000]

Is that why when I ask for ONE piece of scientifically verifiable evidence that proves that evolution is false, the creationists become VERY quiet, or do their best to misrepresent it to fit their silly notions?

Well, if evolution is a so-called false science, then perhaps you can give me an example of the above?

[plusone]

If you want an argument why evo'n is possibly false, try answering my post 68 on the thread about Mosquitoes becoming tolerant of pesticides.

[TheCrusader]

"Is that why when I ask for ONE piece of scientifically verifiable evidence that proves that evolution is false, the creationists become VERY quiet, or do their best to misrepresent it to fit their silly notions?"

You've got the cart before the horse, sir. Theories don't have to be proven false, theories by definition are unproven suppositions. Until a theory is proven true, it remains an hypothesis, a guess. The onus is on you to prove your conjecture. Indeed, your very question is a ruse.